COVID News – 28 December, 2021

COVID News – 28 December, 2021

I had a chat with a friend from Washington state.

She has had 6 people die from covid – 4 of them family –  ALL OF THEM VAXXED.

She has had a granddaughter just diagnosed as covid.


Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine

This research was posted December 10, but I wanted to check with experts before posting. It’s consistent with everything we know so far

Sucharit Bhakdi MD - Chelsea Green Publishing


The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.

No need to worry. It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.

The paper

This paper, posted on December 10, 2021, On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination by Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD, has been getting some attention lately.

The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine and discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all cases.

A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:

  1. inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
  2. the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
  3. a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.

Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.

Here’s the video presentation of the results.

VAERS as well as other independent studies (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events were highly elevated. This study is consistent with those results.

This work independently validates the analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine.

Reactions from a level-headed scientist (name withheld to protect him from attack)

If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions.  The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot.  Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations.  So, in the USA, where ~200M people have been fully inoculated, the number of deaths will not be the 10,000 or so reported in VAERS, or the 150,000+ scaled-up deaths from VAERS, but could be closer to tens of millions when the inoculation effects play out!

What the above three findings (Burkhart, Hoffe, Cole, and I suspect many others who have not yet come forward) show is that the post-inoculation effects are not rare events (as reported by the media-gov’t), but are in actuality frequent events.  They may be, in fact, universal, with the severity and damage different for each recipient

The question in my mind is whether it is possible to reverse these inoculation-based adverse events.  Can the innate immune system be fully restored?  Can the micro clotting be reversed?  Can the autoimmunity be reversed?  I have seen a wide spectrum of opinions on whether this is possible, none of which is overly convincing. 

Are we headed for the situation where the ~30% unvaxxed will be devoting their lives to operating whatever is left of the economic infrastructure and serving as caretakers for the vaxxed?

I realize the above sounds extreme, and maybe when more data are gathered from myriad credible sources the results and conclusions may change, but right now the above data seem to synchronize with the demonstrated underlying mechanisms of damage.  Additionally, we seem to be doubling down on inoculations, with fourth booster being proposed for Israel, and UK suggesting quarterly boosters.

Dr. Ryan Cole’s reaction

Background of two of the scientists behind the study

Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.

Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsequently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

Chinese residents say they are ‘STARVING’ under rules stopping them leaving their homes as country sees record number of Covid cases and expands lockdowns to more cities

  • Xi’an has tightened lockdown for 13million residents, telling them not to go outside even to buy food during new round of Covid testing 
  • Residents in low risk areas will be allowed out to buy essentials once testing is over and provided they are negative, city officials said 
  • Comes after city reported 175 cases today, its highest toll of current outbreak 
  • China is sticking to ‘zero Covid’ strategy despite more-infectious variants

Locked-down residents in one of China‘s biggest cities say they are at risk of starving in their homes after they were banned from going outside even to buy food under harsh new Covid measures sparked by just a few dozen cases.

Apparatchiks running the city of Xi’an on Monday told 13million people they are only allowed out of their homes when invited to take part in a new round of mass testing, or for medical emergencies.

Previously, one member of each household was allowed out once every two days to buy food. City officials said people in ‘low risk’ areas will be allowed out to buy essentials once testing is complete and if their results are negative.

Xi’an reported 175 new cases on Tuesday, a paltry figure compared to other large cities around the world but a major blow to China which is continuing to pursue a ‘zero Covid’ strategy even in the face of more-infectious variants.

Nearby cities have also logged cases linked to the flare-up, with Yan’an – about 185 miles from Xi’an – on Tuesday shuttering businesses and ordering hundreds of thousands of people in one district to stay indoors. 

UK’s Covid cases hit pandemic high with nearly 130,000 in single day even WITHOUT data from Scotland and Wales but hospitalisation rate stays BELOW key lockdown threshold in London… as minister urges NYE revellers to ‘enjoy yourselves cautiously’

  • UK Health Security Agency bosses logged 129,471 positive tests in the last 24 hours, up 43% on last week
  • But the tally only includes daily infection data from England as well as backlogged numbers for Wales
  • Neither of the other two UK nations have yet to feed their numbers into Britain’s official toll, the UKHSA says

Britain’s Covid cases reached another pandemic high today even without data from either Scotland or Northern Ireland amid calls for New Year’s Eve revellers in England to party sensibly.

UK Health Security Agency bosses logged 129,471 positive tests in the last 24 hours, up 43 per cent on last week’s UK-wide figure of 90,629. 

But the tally only includes daily infection data from England, which saw a similar-sized jump in cases, as well as backlogged numbers for Wales. Neither of the other two UK nations have yet to feed their numbers into Britain’s official toll.

COVID Outbreak Spreads To 89 Cruise Ships, Says CDC

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has flagged 89 cruise ships with COVID-19 cases on Tuesday, according to Bloomberg

Since this summer, the cruise ship industry has staged a comeback, but COVID outbreaks on cruise ships in recent weeks (read: here & here) have led some US lawmakers to urge cruise ship operators to halt all sailings.

Investigation Has Launched After Three-Year-Old Girl Dies From Cardiac Arrest One Day After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine in Argentina

The Ministry of Public Health of Tucumán, Argentina released a report that a three-year-old girl died last December 16 and the justice system has intervened and will investigate the cause of her death.

“On Thursday, December 16, 2021, at 12:00 hours, a 3-year-old patient, in cardiorespiratory arrest, enters the Emergency Service of the Hospital of the Child Jesus. Advanced resuscitation maneuvers are carried out and, when [she] does not respond, [her] death is declared,” the Tucumán Ministry of Health said in a statement.

The 3-year-old child, Ámbar Suárez, received one dose of the Sinopharm, China’s COVID-19 vaccine.  The police and justice system will investigate the cause of her death and an autopsy will be performed.

Estimated 1 in 95 boys diagnosed with myocarditis in a California private school

This will blow your mind, I promise. I’m pretty sure that the rate of myocarditis is a LOT more than the CDC is telling people. I think the rate is ~100X higher than they claim. What do you think?Myocarditis

According to this Reuters Fact Check published a few days ago, Dr June Raine, chief executive of Britain’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), said that myocarditis and pericarditis remain a “very rare potential risk” with Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Seriously?!? A rare potential risk, eh? Are you kidding me?!?

Look, just because she said that doesn’t mean it is true.

For a long time, I’ve been on the record as saying that the rate of myocarditis is around 1 in 317 for teenage boys. That was a conservative estimate since it used a VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) of 41, which is reserved for only the most serious events.

Since the CDC calls this “mild” (even though every cardiologist I’ve asked says there is no such thing as “mild” myocarditis), we’d expect a URF of perhaps 80 or more since nobody died and most had a short hospital stay.

In short, a more “realistic” estimate is 1 in 150.

I didn’t want to use that in my original slide because 1 in 317 was already far from the CDC estimate of 1 in 13,000 which they said was “rare.” If I was more accurate, my work would be more likely to be ignored as ridiculously high. So I went with a very conservative URF=41. Here’s the slide I’ve been using up until today:

How the Endless Boosters Will Destroy Immune Function

  • The COVID shots reprogram your immune system to respond in a dysfunctional manner. Aside from increasing vulnerability to infections, this can also result in autoimmune diseases and cancer
  • A paper published in early May 2021 reported the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID jab “reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses,” causing immune depletion
  • Antigens in vaccines have been shown to induce defects in the immune system that can raise the risk of autoimmune diseases
  • Leaky or nonsterilizing vaccines can also trigger the evolution of more hazardous viruses, and the COVID jabs are among the leakiest “vaccines” ever created
  • According to health authorities, the vaccine-evading Omicron variant necessitates a third COVID injection, but this recommendation will only perpetuate mutation


Latest Study Shows Booster Protection Against Omicron Drops 25% After Just 10 Weeks

On Thursday, Britain’s Health Security Agency released the third in a string of studies published this week by researchers from South Africa, Scotland and elsewhere, which attempt to quantify how the omicron variant is less threatening to the international public, especially in societies with high-vaccination (or high previous infection) rates.

The previous two studies, which we covered earlier this week, purported to show that the new variant is up to 2/3rds less likely to send a patient to the hospital, arguing that the variant is inherently less harmful than earlier strains, setting aside the issue of increased levels of immunity in the population.

Additionally, the latest study (courtesy, as we said, of the UKHSA) also offered insights on the limits of vaccines and boosters when it comes to omicron, and, as one might expect given all the strain’s mutations, it found that the efficacy of booster shots vs. the new variant begins to wane even more quickly than against earlier variants like delta.

To wit, after just 10 weeks after a patients’ last booster, immunity has already fallen 15-25%.

“Look, There Is No Federal Solution”: Biden Backtracks On Vow To ‘Shut Down’ Covid-19

On October 22, 2020, then-candidate Joe Biden vowed to “shut down the virus, not the country.

14 months later, now-President Biden just admitted that there’s no ‘federal solution’ to the pandemic, and that it’s up to individual states to do what he promised.

Look, there is no federal solution,” he said during a call with state governors. “This gets solved at state level … and that ultimately gets down to where the rubber meets the road, and that’s where the patient is in need of help — or preventing the need for help.”

“My message to the governors is simple: if you need something, say something. We’re going to have your back in any way we can,” Biden added.


(h/t Becker News

Things already weren’t looking good on the ‘shutting down’ front last week…

Biden’s admission comes days after a Vanity Fair report which revealed that the Biden admin rejected an October proposal to provide rapid at-home tests to Americans before the holidays, allowing them to screen themselves at will and thereby help reduce transmission.

The plan, in effect, was a blueprint for how to avoid what is happening at this very moment—endless lines of desperate Americans clamoring for tests in order to safeguard holiday gatherings, just as COVID-19 is exploding again. Yesterday, President Biden told David Muir of ABC News, “I wish I had thought about ordering” 500 million at-home tests “two months ago.” But the proposal shared at the meeting in October, disclosed here for the first time, included a “Bold Plan for Impact” and a provision for “Every American Household to Receive Free Rapid Tests for the Holidays/New Year.” -VF

In short, Biden isn’t even trying to ‘shut down’ the virus

Adding insult to injury, White House Press Secretary scoffed at the idea of nationwide home tests three weeks ago.

“Should we just send one to every American?”


Watch: Fauci Admits Mandates Are “Just A Mechanism” To Get More People Vaccinated

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

In an appearance Sunday Anthony Fauci admitted that vaccine mandates are merely a “mechanism” to coerce more Americans to take shots.

Appearing on ABC Sunday, Fauci noted “A vaccine requirement for a person getting on the plane is just another level of getting people to have a mechanism that would spur them to get vaccinated.”

The comments came as part of a discussion on applying vaccine mandates to air travel.

Far from following any ‘science’, Fauci admitted that “anything that could get people more vaccinated would be welcome.”


In a follow up appearance Monday on CNN, Fauci admitted that vaccine mandates to fly is likely not going to happen, (because there is no science to it).

“Everything that comes up as a possibility we put it on the table and we consider it,” Fauci declared, adding “That does not mean that it is likely to happen. Right now I don’t think people should expect that we are going to have a requirement in domestic flights for people to be vaccinated.”

“It’s on the table, and we consider it, but that doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. I doubt if we are going to see something like that in the reasonably foreseeable future” Fauci added.


Meanwhile, not content with cancelling Christmas… again, in another CNN interview, Fauci told Americans not to go to or host any new years parties where the vaccination status of any attendees is unknown.

“When you’re talking about a New Year’s Eve party with 30, 40, 50 people celebrating…stay away from that this year. There will be other years to do that, but not this year,” Fauci said.\

Documentary maker reveals his experience of COVID in Australia

Why antibodies are irrelevant:

If cell to cell transmission is genuinely a major route of spreading within tissues, it offers an additional explanation why circulating antibodies are considered all but irrelevant to host protection. 

—Mike Yeadon (via Telegram)

  1. Edited by Peter Palese, Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; received June 20, 2021; accepted November 29, 2021


It is currently unknown if SARS-CoV-2 can spread through cell–cell contacts, and if so, the underlying mechanisms and implications. In this work, we show, by using lentiviral pseudotyped virus, that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 mediates the viral cell-to-cell transmission, with an efficiency higher than that of SARS-CoV. We also find that cell–cell fusion contributes to cell-to-cell transmission, yet ACE2 is not absolutely required. While the authentic variants of concern (VOCs) B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) differ in cell-free infectivity from wild type and from each other, these VOCs have similar cell-to-cell transmission capability and exhibit differential sensitivity to neutralization by vaccinee sera. Results from our study will contribute to a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 spread and pathogenesis.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly transmissible coronavirus responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 spreads through cell–cell contact in cultures, mediated by the spike glycoprotein. SARS-CoV-2 spike is more efficient in facilitating cell-to-cell transmission than is SARS-CoV spike, which reflects, in part, their differential cell–cell fusion activity. Interestingly, treatment of cocultured cells with endosomal entry inhibitors impairs cell-to-cell transmission, implicating endosomal membrane fusion as an underlying mechanism. Compared with cell-free infection, cell-to-cell transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is refractory to inhibition by neutralizing antibody or convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients. While angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 enhances cell-to-cell transmission, we find that it is not absolutely required. Notably, despite differences in cell-free infectivity, the authentic variants of concern (VOCs) B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) have similar cell-to-cell transmission capability. Moreover, B.1.351 is more resistant to neutralization by vaccinee sera in cell-free infection, whereas B.1.1.7 is more resistant to inhibition by vaccinee sera in cell-to-cell transmission. Overall, our study reveals critical features of SARS-CoV-2 spike-mediated cell-to-cell transmission, with important implications for a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 spread and pathogenesis.

A NY Times editor has died of a heart attack at 49, one day after receiving a Moderna Covid “booster” shot

Carlos Tejada was married and had two children; he spent his career at the Wall Street Journal before joining the Times in 2016.

In July, he received a Johnson & Johnson DNA/AAV Covid vaccine. He was thankful to get it, per his Instagram page.

On Dec. 16, in Seoul, South Korea, he received a Moderna mRNA/LNP “booster.” No clinical trials have ever been conducted to examine the safety or efficacy of mixing various types of these vaccines, and Carlos did not give informed consent, as the consent form was in Korean, a language he could not read. He joked that Omicron should “hit me with your wet snot.”

Fauci says to cancel New Year’s Eve parties, as millions struggle for normalcy nearly two years into pandemic

Amid young adult mental health crisis, Fauci says to stay away from normalcy of New Year’s Eve parties: ‘Not this year’

Top White House coronavirus adviser Anthony Fauci said on CNN Monday morning that Americans should cancel their New Year’s Eve parties due to the increasing spread of the omicron coronavirus variant, as Americans struggle to find some normalcy as the pandemic wraps up its second year. 

“I would stay away from that,” Fauci said when asked about the annual parties on CNN’s “New Day.” 

“I have been telling people consistently that if you’re vaccinated and boosted and you have a family setting, in the home with family and relatives,” it’s OK to gather, Fauci continued. “But when you’re talking about a New Year’s Eve party, we have 30, 40, 50 people celebrating. You do not know the status of their vaccination, I would recommend strongly stay away from that this year.”

A Third Of Brits Think The Pandemic Will Never End, New Poll Finds

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A new poll finds that a third of Brits think the pandemic, and all the restrictions that come with it, will NEVER end.

Yes, really.

Approaching two years into the pandemic, the YouGov poll finds that, “A third (33%) of Britons think the Covid-19 pandemic will never be effectively over in the UK, while just 4% of Britons think the pandemic is already effectively over.”

A further 41 per cent think that it will be at least another year before the pandemic is over, while 21 per cent think it will be more than two years.

Since the rise of the Omicron variant, just 12 per cent of Brits think that their life has returned to normal.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson is still being lobbied to place further restrictions on people living in England despite numerous studies proving the Omicron variant to be milder than previous strains.

As we previously highlighted, official figures out of England show that 65% of people described as ‘COVID patients’ only tested positive for COVID after being admitted to hospital for something else.

Journalist Allison Pearson, citing NHS sources, also revealed how only 5 per cent of hospital beds are occupied by COVID patients in England and that “overall hospital occupancy currently stands at 89 per cent,” which is a decent figure for the NHS in winter.

Facebook Now Censoring the British Medical Journal Because New Science Goes Against Pfizer’s Lies and Deception

By Ethan Huff

Fiona Godlee, the editor of The British Medical Journal (BMJ), has written a letter to Facebook (Meta) CEO Mark Zuckerberg blasting him for the social media platform’s “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible … fact-check” protocols that we now know are just a censorship tool.

One of the oldest and most highly respected scientific journals in the world, The BMJ recently published a report entitled, “Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial” that calls into question the “science” behind Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine.” Because the report does not unquestioningly praise the jabs as “safe and effective,” Facebook “fact checked” it and deemed it as containing “false information.”

Starting on November 10, Facebook users who tried to share the article encountered problems. Many were unable to share it at all while others say the post was flagged with a warning that stated: “Missing context … Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Still others were prompted with warnings advising them to not try to share “false information.”

It turns out that Facebook contractor “Lead Stories” was responsible for all this censorship. After learning what had happened, Godlee ripped Zuckerberg a new one, highlighting the following points about the so-called “fact check” in her letter to him:

  • It did not present any assertions of fact that The BMJ article supposedly got wrong.
  • It used the following nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.”
  • The first paragraph inaccurately labeled The BMJ a “news blog.”
  • A screenshot of The BMJ report that Facebook posted with a “Flaws Reviewed” stamp over the top of it failed to identify anything false or untrue.
  • It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert.”
  • Lead Stories was contacted by The BMJ concerning these and other issues but the company refused to make any changes.
  • The BMJ also tried to contact Facebook directly about removing the “fact check,” but was refused…..

USS Milwaukee Warship Confined in Cuba After COVID Outbreak Hits Fully Vaccinated Crew

On Friday the US Navy announced that the USS Milwaukee warship was forced to remain in port after a COVID outbreak hit its 100% vaccinated crew.

The infected sailors are being isolated on the ship at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay.

New York State Moves to Criminalize COVID information They don’t like

The state of New York is moving to criminalize – and make Civilly Actionable by ANYBODY —  speech they don’t like, especially when it comes to COVID-19.  Under a new Bill, anyone can be civilly sued by anyone and everyone,  for publishing anything that “Advocates for self-harm, is directed to inciting or producing imminent self-harm, and is likely to incite or produce such action; or Includes a false statement of fact or fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the safety or health of the public.”

New York State Senator Brad Hoylman (oy vey) has introduced a Bill which he describes this way:

In the week before the anniversary of the notorious January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, and as vaccine hesitancy continues to fuel the Omicron variant, Senator Brad Hoylman (D/WFP-Manhattan) announced new legislation (S.7568) to hold social media platforms accountable for knowingly promoting disinformation, violent hate speech, and other unlawful content that could harm others. While Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects social media platforms from being treated as publishers or speakers of content shared by users on their apps and websites, this legislation instead focuses on the active choices these companies make when implementing algorithms designed to promote the most controversial and harmful content, which creates a general threat to public health and safety.

Senator Hoylman said: “Social media algorithms are specially programmed to spread disinformation and hate speech at the expense of the public good. The prioritization of this type of content has real life costs to public health and safety.  So when social media push anti-vaccine falsehoods and help domestic terrorists plan a riot at the U.S.  Capitol, they must be held accountable. Our new legislation will force social media companies to be held accountable for the dangers they promote.”

For years, social companies have claimed protection from any legal consequences of their actions relating to content on their websites by hiding behind Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Social media websites are no longer simply a host for their users’ content, however. Many social media companies employ complex algorithms designed to put the most controversial and provocative content in front of users as much as possible. These algorithms drive engagement with their platform, keep users hooked, and increase profits. Social media companies employing these algorithms are not an impassive forum for the exchange of ideas; they are active participants in the conversation. 

In October 2021, Frances Haugen, a former Facebook employee, provided shocking testimony to United State Senators alleging that the company knew of research proving that its product was harmful to teenagers but purposefully hid that research from the public. She also provided testimony that the company was willing to use hateful content to retain users on the social media website.  

Social media amplification has been linked to many societal ills, including vaccine disinformation, encouragement of self-harm, bullying, and body-image issues among youth, and extremist radicalization leading to terrorist attacks like the January 6th insurrection against the U.S. Capitol. 

When a website knowingly or recklessly promotes hateful or violent content, they create a threat to public health and safety. The conscious decision to elevate certain content is a separate, affirmative act from the mere hosting of information and therefore not contemplated by the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. 

This bill will provide a tool for the Attorney General, city corporation counsels, and private citizens to hold social media companies and others accountable when they promote content they know or reasonably should know the content: 

  1. Advocates for the use of force, is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and is likely to produce such action; 
  1. Advocates for self-harm, is directed to inciting or producing imminent self-harm, and is likely to incite or produce such action; or 
  1. Includes a false statement of fact or fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the safety or health of the public.  


So, if, for instance, you or I say “Masks only filter particles down to four microns but the coronavirus in 100 times smaller at 0.04 microns, so masks don’t work, don’t wear them” then we are “advocating self harm” (not wearing a mask) and may also be guilty of a “false medical theory.”


If you or I say these new COVID-19 “vaccines” aren’t actually vaccines, they’re experimental Gene therapy and you shouldn’t take these experimental genetic therapies because 16,000+ Americans have already died from them, and over 600,000 have already been seriously injured by them”, then we may also be guilty of “fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the public . . . .”

Other aspects of the Bill include merely publishing violent speech.   So, for instance, if I go on the air and remind the public about Alexander Hamilton, a former US President and one of America’s Founding Fathers, who wrote, in Federalist 28, Paragraph 6 “If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, . . . The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. . . .”  

Then that is violent speech punishable under this Bill.

Put simply, New York State now wants to allow you and I to be sued out of existence if you and I even SPEAK about things that disagree with them concerning COVID, or for even daring to speak about things like what our own Founding Fathers talked about, if we then try to apply Founding Fathers logic to our present day situation. 

It seems the New York State Legislature has decided that we must, therefore, speak only as THEY speak, and espouse only the views THEY approve of, or face prison or be wrecked by Civil Litigation brought by whoever wants to, and go Bankrupt defending against such litigation.

Hal Turner Remark: It is not lost on me that the specific legislative District of the Senator sponsoring this Bill, happens to be the precise District wherein my radio show originated. 

The source who contacted me from inside the New York State Legislature today, and told me “This Bill WILL pass and YOU are the target” says that the New York State Legislature is running into all sorts of pushback from the public on the COVID thing and they are (rightly or wrongly) blaming me for that pushback.  They want me gone.

Now, I know that I don’t come off as anyone worthy enough for this kind of attention by a legislative body, but the last time I published the names, home addresses, and unlisted phone numbers of a bunch of US Senators, they made what I did explicitly illegal under 18 USC 119 euphemistically referred-to as the “Get Hal Turner Law” enacted after I blew out the Grand Bargain Immigration Reform Act.  So maybe New York figures if I was worthy enough for Congress to act against, I must be worthy enough for them to do so as well.

Here is a link to the State Senator’s web page on the subject:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial