DR. SHERRI TENPENNY EXPLAINS HOW THE DEPOPULATION COVID VACCINES WILL START WORKING IN 3-6 MONTHS
REQUIRED VIEWING! Dr. Sherri Tenpenny gives VERY important information! Hyper-immune response in test animals for previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines, like SARS and MERS, has been a persistent problem. All is well for awhile, until the animals are exposed to the wild mutated virus. Dr. Tenpenny and other scientists have forecast that millions may die, and it will be blamed on a new strain of COVID, making an argument for even more deadly vaccines. See: “The Coming Genocide of Adverse COVID Vax Reactions, and Who to Blame for It”
THE COMING GENOCIDE OF ADVERSE COVID VAX REACTIONS, AND WHO TO BLAME FOR IT
25 January, 2021
Although according to the US federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 181 deaths have been recorded possibly related to recent COVID vaccinations, and a CDC registry reports that, as of the end of December, experimental COVID vaccinations have so far caused over 7,844, adverse reactions, some scientists are warning that far worse effects of the Warp Speed vaccines are yet to come.
At least 3,150 of the adverse reactions have rendered people “unable to work,” or perform “daily activities.”
(See: “181 People Die After COVID Vaccine in US “Adverse Events”, Nurses Refuse to Give Vaccines for Ethical Reasons”)
Prof. Dolores Cahill received her PhD in Immunology from Dublin City University in 1994. She was group leader of the Protein Technology Group in the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics, Berlin, and is Professor of Translational Science at the UCD School of Medicine and Medical Sciences.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny D.O., is an American physician. A DO is a physician who completes medical school the same as an MD, who may perform surgery and prescribe medications with equal rights and privileges as an MD.
Judy Mikovits received a PhD in biochemistry from George Washington University, and in 2006, she became the Research Director of the Whittemore Peterson Institute.
Cahill, Tenpenny, Mikovits, and other doctors and scientists are warning of a coming mass casualty event, involving people who have received experimental stage COVID vaccines, due to a reaction known as hyper-immune response. Hyper-immune response has been observed in test animals in prior attempts to develop vaccines for other coronaviruses, such as SARS and MERS. The response may not take place until months after the injections, when subjects encounter the wild, mutated virus.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder of Children’s Health Defense, writes:
“Scientists first attempted to develop coronavirus vaccines after China’s 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak. Teams of US & foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs. Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1960s. Two children died.”
The UK Independent reported:
“COVID-19, like other coronaviruses, is expected to mutate at least every season, raising serious questions about claims that any vaccine will work. A successful vaccine has never been developed for any of the many strains of coronaviruses, due to the nature of the virus itself; and vaccinated people can have a higher chance of serious illness and death when later exposed to another strain of the virus, a phenomenon known as ‘virus interference.’ An earlier SARS vaccine never made it to market because the laboratory animals it was tested on contracted more serious symptoms on re-infection, and most of them died.”
One of the studies cited by scientists is “Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus.” The mechanism which causes the deadly response upon much later exposure to the wild virus is called “pathogenic priming.”
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Pittsburgh, writes in a science paper on previous efforts to develop coronavirus vaccines:
“In SARS, a type of “priming” of the immune system was observed during animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals who were subsequently exposed to wild SARS virus. The problem, highlighted in two studies, became obvious following post-vaccination challenge with the SARS virus…”
In the below video presentations, these doctors and scientists give lucid explanations how hyper-immune response in COVID vaccine test animals comes about, and why, in three to six months or more, they expect to see large numbers of vaccinated people exhibit the response when exposed to the wild, mutated virus.
None other than Dr. Anthony Fauci has acknowledged the phenomenon known as virus interference, which is when vaccines actually make exposure to a virus worse. Fauci told a congressional committee in the spring:
“I must warn that there is a possibility of negative consequences where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection,”
Warnings of the particular dangers in the development of coronavirus, as opposed to other types of viruses such as influenza, are abundant. Both SARS and MERS are coronaviruses, and at least four other strains of coronaviruses are in circulation, to which nearly everyone has been exposed, most often resulting in a common cold.
The biotech industry newsletter Biopharma Dive writes:
“There has never been a vaccine for any coronavirus. And many vaccine developers have based their designs on previous research into other coronaviruses, like SARS or MERS, which share genetic similarities with SARS-CoV-2, but differences as well. Much still remains unknown about the novel coronavirus, and how our bodies respond to infection.”
Writing for Nature Magazine, Shibo Jiang, professor of virology at Fudan University, China, says:
“I have worked to develop vaccines and treatments for coronaviruses since 2003, when the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak happened. In my view, standard protocols are essential for safeguarding health. Before allowing use of a COVID-19 vaccine in humans, regulators should evaluate safety with a range of virus strains and in more than one animal model…Work with the SARS virus shows that worrying immune responses were seen in ferrets and monkeys, but not in mice.”
If a nightmare scenario unfolds, who will be to blame? The entire cast of medical establishment, media, business, and political players who have kept up the panic atmosphere over a 99.4% to 99.8% survival rate virus, the death toll for which a team of researchers in one state found may be inflated by as much as 40%. Government health authorities such as Dr. Anthony Fauci are behind a relentless drive for mass vaccinations over simple, effective remedies, like HCQ and Ivermectin.
Last April Fauci was the subject of a Newsweek expose’ which showed that Fauci was behind a $3.7 million grant to China’s Wuhan Lab to conduct research on bat coronavirus which was banned in the US after being deemed too dangerous : “Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research.”
For an overview of the funding and promotional players behind the pandemic response, see below “Bill Gates Critic Ron Paul Shut-Down from Facebook After “Great Reset” Article.”
Professor Dolores Cahill: Why People Will Start Dying A Few Months After The First Mrna Vaccination (View at Bitchute)
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Why Many COVID-Vaccinated People Will Die or Lose Function Six Months After Getting Vaccines (View at Bitchute)
Dr. Judy Mikovits’ Warning That COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million Americans (MP4 download backup link)
IT’S OVER! REMEDIES OBVIATE NEED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES, NOW IT’S MURDER
Debbie Maimon of the prestigious Orthodox Jewish newspaper Yated Neeman writes on Feb. 3rd:
“For the second time in a month, strong positions taken against early outpatient drug treatment for Covid-19 by federal agencies and the medical establishment have quietly been withdrawn. This suggests a long-awaited turning point in the battle against the disease, many believe. Three weeks ago, the NIH withdrew its opposition to “wonder-drug” ivermectin as a treatment for both outpatient and hospitalized Covid patients.”
Ms. Maimon notes the role played by the US Senate Homeland Security hearings, led by Senator Ron Johnsonn (R-WI), in giving physicians the right to determine whether to use the drug in their treatment of Covid-19 patients.
The NIH has upgraded their recommendation on ivermectin, making it an option for use in COVID-19.
“This new designation upgraded the status of ivermectin from “against” to “neither for nor against”, which is the same recommendation given to monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma, both widely used across the nation.”
The new policy, which is still heavily suppressed in the Google and Yahoo search engines making it nearly impossible to find unless one is a skilled researcher, follows another whisper-quiet change in policy toward hydroxychloroquine (HCQ,) reflected by the republication at the NIH scientific repository of the paper “Antimalarials as Antivirals for COVID-19: Believe it or Not!”
This is in addition to the publication this January, unreported in major media, of a Hackensack Meridian Health, NJ, study concluding that, after a year of bitter suppression of success around the world with HCQ, patients with mild symptoms of the virus who received HCQ are “significantly less likely to end up in the hospital.”
This is long after Dr. Harvey Risch, of the Yale School of Public Medicine, said, to mockery and near-libel, that judicious use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ,) in precise protocols, could have saved “75,000 to 100,000 Lives.” (HCQ studies)
The soft-spoken Dr. Risch was not cowed, and came out with guns blazing on an even more controversial topic, if that is possible, the role of Dr. Anthony Fauci in using his clout as a high official in the past to suppress life-saving treatments for AIDS in the Eighties.
On Fox News last night (Sunday, August 23, 2020) on the Mark Levin show, Dr. Risch said:
“The FDA … has a history of not making science-based, rational-based, decisions about its approvals.
This was started most noticeably in 1987, when people with AIDS in New York City were dying of what is called pneumocystis pneumonia, PCP.
The clinical experience then had been amassed of a large number of cases who were prevented from dying by use of the antibiotic bacterium.
This is (another case where) even then there was a generic medication and cheap.
And activists obtained a meeting with Dr. Fauci and 15 of his selected scientists at the NIH, and asked Dr. Fauci just to make guidelines to physicians that they consider using bactrim to treat preventively AIDS people so that they wouldn’t die of this pneumonia.
Dr. Fauci refused.
He said, ‘I want randomized controlled blinded trial evidence. That’s my gold standard – that or nothing.’
The activists left and the NIH did not fund any randomized trials. They raised money themselves from their own AIDS patients to collect the data to do a randomized trial.
But it took them 2 years. They came back to Dr. Fauci.
During those 2 years, the FDA approved AZT as a treatment for AIDS.
AZT works, but not completely, it needs other medications as well.
During the two years that it took them to get this data to come back to Dr. Fauci to support using bactrim, 17,000 people with AIDS died because of Dr. Fauci’s insistence on not allowing even a statement supporting consideration of the use.
This has gone on before.”
The Forced Experimental Vaccine Program Unravels
Now with fficial CDC possible vaccine-related deaths, as of Jan. 29, hitting 501 deaths. 10,748 reported injuries, and 153 permanent disabilities, the question may be asked, why continue to risk what amount to experimental trials on humans, some not fully aware that they are being experimented on?
The fact remains that the vaccines are currently only allowed because the FDA has issued an EUA, and “emergency use authorization,” and are still not approved for general public use.
Contrasted to two of the safest over-the-counter drugs in the world, why would anyone chose to be a guinea pig?
Moreover, when one asks why studies would be designed for HCQ to appear dangerous, one must wonder what kind of larger deception is in process. One study cited by the FDA which showed that HCQ may cause heart side effects was conducted by administering many times the recommended dose, as much as 1200 mg a day for 10 days.
The upper-end dose for Plaquenil (HCQ) for the treatment of malaria (not the smaller prevention dose) is, according to directions:
Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.
This is the study which prompted the FDA to issue its warning over the use of HCQ.
From this point on, the media and medical establishment’s withholding of information on safe, life-saving treatments must be considered nothing short of accomplice to murder.