A shocking document As planned, the United States, the war and the crisis of Europe
- In what appears to be an exceptional data leak from the close-to-the-government think tank, the RAND Corporation, known among other things, to have been behind an American strategy for foreign and defense policy during the Cold War, a detailed account is given of how the energy crisis in Europe: it was planned by the United States.
- The document, dated January, acknowledges that the aggressive foreign policy pursued in Ukraine, will pressure Russia into having to intervene militarily in the country. The purpose, they explain, is to introduce a sanctions package that has been prepared for a long time.
- The EUROPEAN union’s economy, it states, “will inevitably collapse as a result of this, and it rejoices, among other things, that the resources, up to 9000 billion dollars can flow into the United States, and that a well-educated European youth will be forced to emigrate.
- The main goal line, they describe is to divide Europe – especially in Germany and Russia, – to destroy the European economy, by getting useful idiots in politics to stop the Russian energy supplies to the continent.
As the first newspaper in Europe, the New and the original can publish what appear to be the United States of AMERICA’s classified plans to crush the European economy, with the war in Ukraine, and an induced energy crisis.
The RAND think tank , which has a total of 1850 employees with a budget of 350 million dollars and has the common purpose of improving policy-and decision-making through research and analysis. It is primarily connected to the Department of Defense, the United States, and is notorious for having been influential in developing the military and other decision-making during the Cold War.
A documents signed by the edge, with the opening of the heading “Weaken Germany, strengthen the united states of AMERICA”, it is believed that there is an “urgent need” for an influx of resources from the outside to maintain the American economy in general, but “especially to the banking system.
” The Only European countries bound by the EUROPEAN union and NATO commitments can provide us with these without a significant military and political costs .”
The biggest obstacle to this is according to RAND, is the first of the independence of Germany. Among other things, it is pointed out that Brexit had given the German and greater independence, and made it more difficult for the U.S. to influence the decisions of the European governments.
A key goal that pervades the cynical strategy is, above all, to destroy the co-operation between Germany and Russia and also parts of France.
” If it comes to fruition, it would make Europe not only an economic, but also a political competitor to the United States ,” it declares.
Only way: “Drag both sides into war in Ukraine”
To crush this political threat, a strategic plan is presented which is primarily aimed at destroying the German economy.
” Stopping Russian supplies could create a systematic crisis that would be devastating for the German economy and indirectly for the entire EU “, they state, and believe that the key is to drag Europe’s countries into war.
” The only possible way to ensure that Germany rejects Russian energy supplies is to draw both sides into the military conflict in Ukraine. Our continued actions in this country will inevitably lead to a military response from Russia. Russia is clearly not going to leave the massive Ukrainian army’s pressure on the Donbass republics without a military response. It would make it possible to portray Russia as the aggressive party and then apply the entire already prepared package of sanctions ”.
The Green parties will make Germany’s “fall into ” the trap”
In particular, the green parties in Europe are described as easy-to-manipulate-to-do-the-business-of-the-American anti-imperialism.
” The prerequisite for Germany to fall into this trap is to the leading role of green parties and ideologies in Europe. The German environmental movement, is a strongly dogmatic, if not fanatical, the movement, which makes it quite easy to get them to ignore the economic arguments “it writes, citing the current foreign minister of Germany, Annalena Baerbock, the climate change minister, Robert Habeck, as examples of this type of politician. .
” Staff characteristics, and the lack of professionalism will make it possible to assume that it is impossible for them to admit their own mistakes in time. Thus, it will be enough to quickly shape a media image of Putin’s aggressive war, and to make the Greens ardent and tough supporters of the sanctions – a “party of war”. It will make it possible to impose the sanctions without any obstacles “.
Among other things, Baerbock has made a name for herself by declaring that she will maintain the stoppage of Russian gas, even during the winter – regardless of what her constituents think about the matter, and what the consequences are for the German population.
– We stay with Ukraine, and that means that the sanctions will stay, but also in the winter – even if it will be very tough for politicians , she it at a conference in Prague recently.
“At best a complete stop -“
The authors express a hope that the damage between Germany and Russia, will be so great that it will be impossible for the countries to re-establish normal relations at the time.
” A reduction in a number of Russian energy supplies is at best a complete stop would lead to catastrophic consequences for the World industry. The need to set aside significant amounts of Russian gas, but the manner in which homes and public buildings, heated during the winter, will further exacerbate the shortages. Shutdowns in the industry will lead to a shortage of components and spare parts for manufacturing, and a collapse of the logistics chain, and sooner or later a domino effect ”.
Ultimately, a complete collapse of Europe’s economy is seen as both likely and desirable.
” Not only will this deliver a crushing blow to the World economy of the entire EUROPEAN economy, will inevitably collapse .”
They further point out the advantages of a U.S.-based companies having less competition on the world market, the logistical advantages, and the outflow of capital from Europe, it is estimated that it will be able to benefit the U.S. economy by 7 to 9 trillion dollars. In addition, the important effect is that the many of the well-educated, and the Europeans will be forced to emigrate to the united states of AMERICA is also emphasized.
RAND denies the origin of the report
On Wednesday, the RAND issued a press release denying that the report originated with them. On the other hand, there is no response regarding how the report is false, or what, would not be true, but simply write that you ” see ” the content as “bizarre”, and that the document is “false”.