Looking at the evidence of “Agenda 21″and the climate change hoax

Looking at the evidence of “Agenda 21″and the climate change hoax

David Icke, 

Agenda 21 and the Non- 

Profit Industrial Complex


though I’m pretty obsessed with what’s happening in my own
backyard, with the fires in Australia, I am doing what I normally do
at this time of year and that is to take stock And try to make sense
of some things that I don’t have time for during the year.

have been making my way through the voluminous tome of David
Everything You Wanted to Know But Were Never Told and
trying to make sense of some things that I don’t have time for
during the year.

It is giving me a good insight into the world of some of the more extreme conspiracy theories.

has surprised me is that Ike’s writing It’s not as daft as I
might have thought. Yes, it does seem that he believes and shapeshifting lizards but this is all within a larger context. 

He harks
back to the Gnostic gospels and talks of archontic beings that could
be compared With the concept of Demons, or the Devil, in
Christianity. These beings are hiding true reality, which is that all
we are in Icke’s words is “Consciousness having an experience
and so are distorting our perceptions of reality so they can control
humans in their own demonic interests.

book covers many subjects but one of them is Agenda 21 and what he
calls “the climate change scam”. I decided to take a closer look,
not to denounce or dismiss but to understand. 

I have a lot of
interaction with climate change deniers who refer back to 

Agenda 21
as if it is a slam dunk that climate change is something made up the New World Order.

“arguments” are so spurious but I have never been able to take
them seriously so I have decided to take some time to try and get an
understanding of what this is all about.


However, I must say that in
my daily interactions on social media there is a funny sense in which I am more irritated by some of the liberals talking about climate change as if it is the only problem we are faced by.

To give an example, I wrote a piece on how through sale of water rights and fracking and mining Australia’s water is being stolen.  But to this liberal numbskull this is nothing but “climate change denial”

It does not matter whether the information is truthful or not – it goes along with a closed mind that has not researched or gone through the issues.

To give another example, someone posted a comment that referred to the spraying of aluminium, barium and strontium leading to the desiccation of the country.  In response to this someone who fancies himself as well-educated and well-informed came out with a comment I see repeated from time to time – that aluminium is one of the most common elements on the planet.

It took me approximately 30 seconds to check on Google and to find out that aluminium cannot exist on its own in Nature.


These people know it all and it seems to be sufficient (in their minds) to throw something into the works – the first thing that comes into their heads – even if it isn’t true.

it is a case of “it is difficult to get a man to
understand something, when his salary depends upon his not


No wonder I have never been able to work the whole Agenda 21 thing out.  

I went looking on Google which is the fount of all official wisdom, and could find nothing that would give me a good sense of the specifics of Agenda 21, still less confirm or deny what the conspiracists like Icke are saying.

See how “helpful” Wikipedia (again, another fount for everything the Elite want us to believe).

“21” in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st century. It has been
affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences.
Its aim is achieving global sustainable development. One major
objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government
should draw its own local Agenda 21.

Agenda is a commitment to eradicate poverty and achieve sustainable
development by 2030 world-wide, ensuring that no one is left behind.
The adoption of the 2030 Agenda was a landmark achievement, providing
for a shared global vision towards sustainable development for all.

Instead, they refer to a 500 page publication which, if you have the time and energy you can read HERE.

Not that I can confirm it without reading through a 500-page document but this is what Icke says the goals of Agenda 21 are, “in their own words”

  • An
    end to national sovereignty
  • State
    planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts,
    forest, mountains, oceans and freshwater; agriculture; rural 
    development; Biotechnology: and ensuring equity
  • The
    state to define the role of business and financial resources 
  • Abolition
    of private property
  • Restructuring
    the family unit
  • Children
    raised by the state
  • People
    told what their job will be
  • Major
    restrictions on movement
  • Creation
    of human settlement zones
  • Mass
    resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they live
  • Dumbing
    down education
  • Mass
    global depopulation in pursuit of all the above.

If you look forward to Agenda 2030 this is what they are claiming as their “aspirational goals”:

poverty; zero hunger; good health and well-being; clean water and
sanitation; affordable and clean energy; decent work and economic
growth; industry, innovation and infrastructure; reduced
inequalities; Sustainable cities and communities; responsible
consumption and production; climate action; protecting life on land;
peace, justice and strong institutions and partnerships to achieve
these goals”

This reads like a very sick joke in 2020.

You’d have to be a fool (or perhaps a liberal) to be taken in.

Here are just a few things Icke is pointing to.


Icke cites Dr. Richard Day who he says was an Illuminati insider who
invited medical students to put away their tape recorders and note
pads while he gave a lecture that turned out to be an insight into
what our Rulers had in store for the rest of us back then.   

content of this lecture was revealed by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan
who realised the importance of what was being said so wrote notes on

he began his talk, Dr Day asked everyone to turn off all tape
recorders and stop taking notes so that he could tell them, the
prospective leaders of organised medicine, what was going to happen
in the future. Dr Dunegan sensed that Dr Day’s message would be
important, ignored the request and noted the points made by him on a
set of table napkins. He later wrote up these notes, which formed the
basis for the three tapes.”

transcript of Dr Lawrence Dunegan’s taped reminiscences of
off-the-record remarks by Illuminati Insider,Dr Richard Day on 20
March 1969 can be found HERE

are s few quotes from Dr.Day. 

more highly educated people who have higher incomes can consume more
resources than poorly educated people who tend to have lower incomes.
In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

and epic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape.
Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as
impoverishment, slums and chante between rich and poor. Religious and
ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape.
Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as
impoverishment, slums and shanty towns rapidly expand alongside
modern high-rises, technological advances and ever increasing levels
of prosperity. This is the world of our future.”

to Dr. Day privately owned housing will become a thing of the past.
The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so
high that most people couldn’t afford it; young people with more
and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums.

would not be able to buy (homes) and gradually more and more of the
population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments
which would not accommodate very many children.…

people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common
to have non-family members living with you. It’s my way of your not
knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under
the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind… When
they ask, how many bedrooms in your house? Do you have a finished
game room? This information is personal and is of no national
interest to government under our existing constitution. But you’ll
be asked his questions…”

of the things mentioned in Dr. Day in 1969 must have seen outlandish
and even impossible. However, we look back in hindsight it is not
difficult to conclude that there were certain things that the Elite
had in mind for the rest of us even back then.

urban future, the emerging complexity

Icke talks about how people are being forced to live in smaller and
smaller apartments. I don’t see a particular evil in that but he also
talks about the 
at Grenfell Towers
it is not difficult to see as an attempt to get poorer communities
out of the Chelsea Borough in London, to support the gentrification
of a rich neighbourhood. The building was refitted with cladding that
was a fire risk and people were told to stay in place; the folk that
survived were those that received phone calls from neighbouring
towers that could see what was going on. Others sent 
phone messages

other buildings have been reclad in the same way.

you look at this video obtained by the
 it shows the US military military hierarchy
already knows is in the wings.

Here are some quotes:

future is urban. By 2030 urban areas are expected to grow by 1,.4
billion with that growth occurring almost entirely in the developing
world. Cities will account for 60% of the world’s population and 70%
of the world’s GDP. The urban environment will be the locus where
drivers of instability will converge. By the year 2030, 60% of urban
dwellers will be under the age of 18. the cities that grow the
fastest will be the most challenged as resources become constrained
and elicit networks fill the gap by over extended and
undercapitalised governments

will magnify the increasing separation between rich and poor.
Religious and epic tensions will be a defining element in the social
landscape. Religious and ethnic tensions will be a defining element
in the social landscape. Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented
development as impoverishment, slums and shanty towns rapidly expand
alongside modern high-rises, technological advances and ever
increasing levels of prosperity. This is the world of our future.”

structures will be equally challenged if not dysfunctional as
historic ways of life clash with modern living, ethnic and racial
differences are forced to live together and criminal networks offer
opportunity for the growing mess of unemployed.”

The Hunger Games Society

it is said that Hollywood will signal where the Elite wants to take

example of this is the movie series, the Hunger Games Society
that portrayed a dystopia in which a tiny few mega-rich
people employed a vicious and merciless police/military state to
impose their will upon a poverty-stricken population maintained in
ongoing inter-generational slavery
” (p.415).

cites real-life examples such as people being made homeless while
laws make it illegal to sleep rough and feeding the homeless is
against the law in some places and people are subject to arrest.

are just a few examples:

  • In
    case you think these are drug addicts and the like there are many
    people who had nice jobs and houses before the financial meltdown
    who are now in America’s
    tent cities

  • We
    now have legislation whereby governments can take people’s money
    deposited in banks to save the very banks that caused the

says that is where we are being taken and the Hunger Games Society is
founded on a world government that would dictate to every community. 
One can see the signs of this future perhaps in the globalist
dictatorship of the
European Union

  • “All
    food production and distribution will be strictly controlled in the
    Hunger Games Society and this is the motivation behind the incessant
    centralisation of food production and seed ownership by mergers and
    take-overs of giant corporations such as Monsanto and Bayer.”


can read more about this in chapter 12 of Icke’s book (pp.415-421)

of the weather

What the hell is HAARP actually doing? | @ConspiracyStuff ...

Icke talks of geoengineering and weather manipulation as  way to force people of the land and into human settlement megacities
Is through control of the weather.

HAARP: Secret Weapon Used For Weather Modification, Electromagnetic Warfare

Something that I learned was that many
leading figures In the wartime Manhattan Project would later work in
weather modification and manipulation of the atmosphere because there
are many cross overs between atomic bomb physics and those of weather

Edward Teller and others were amongst those who made the transition from went Manhattan project would later work in
with weather modification and manipulation of the atmosphere because there
are many crossovers between atomic bomb physics and those of weather

weather manipulation would appear to have entered a whole new phase
after the death of Nicola Tesla in 1943 when his cutting edge
research documents and to the nature of the electrical atmosphere
were confiscated by the US government new paragraph”

A researcher, Peter A. Kirby goes into this here:

Rockefeller asset Dr. Richard Day worked in weather control during World War 11 and he revealed what was possible in 1969 while explaining hiw this would be used to impose the ‘new system’ of those her represented.

Dr. Dunegan recalled:

was a mention of weather. This was another really striking statement.
He said: and we can all soon will be able to control the weather. He
said: I am not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the
clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but real control.
And weather was seen as a weapon of war A weapon of influencing
public policy. It could make rain or withhold rain in order to
influence certain areas and bring them under your control.

were two sides to this that we are rather striking. He said: on the
one hand you can make trout during the growing season so that nothing
will grow, and on the other you can make for a very heavy rains
during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the
harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both. There was no
statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was
already possible or very, very close to being possible (in 1969).”

This is what David Icke has to say about HAARP and ionosphere heaters:

called ionosphere heaters were originally based on technology
developed by Nicola Tesla in the first half Of the 20th century and
included in his seized papers. They have been installed around the
world with the potential to manipulate weather patterns even more
fundamentally as technology has improved and HAARP is history in
terms of capability. Weather manipulation is now the result of
frequencies directed from many sources that meet the desired point
to collectively contribute to the effect and the most powerful can
create an earthquake. These techniques include manipulation of the
scalar field (faced again on teslas research into the
scalar phenomenon)”


Agenda 2030 references to zero hunger and clean water are (according to Icke), worded to hide the fact that the plan is to centrally control the population and distribution of both food and water controls.

“Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people”

Henry Kissinger

From Dr. Dunegan:

was a mention of weather. This was another really striking statement.
He said: and we can all soon will be able to control the weather. He
said: ‘I am not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the
clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but REAL control.’ And weather was seen as a weapon of war A weapon of influencing
public policy. It could make rain or withhold rain in order to
influence certain areas and bring them under your control.

were two sides to this that we are rather striking. He said: on the
one hand you can make trout during the growing season so that nothing
will grow, and on the other you can make for a very heavy rains
during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the
harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both. There was no
statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was
already possible or very, very close to being possible
(in 1969).”

He also cites the following:

  • In 1913 corn was 100% owned by farmers; by 2013 it was 95% owned by corporations with 90% GM0.
  • There is a siege
    against small farms and smallholders that is connected to the increasing
    attacks on people growing their own food in their own or community
  • Zoning
    laws (‘you can’t do that here‘)  are one of the major tools being employed. 
  • Food production and seed ownership is being centralised – to whit Monsanto, Bayer and GMOs. The
    proposed $66 billion Bayer takeover of Monsanto would give them
    control of more than 25% of the worlds seeds and pesticides.
  • In Oregon the government is claiming ownership of  every drop of water (even  rain or snow . One couple was told to destroy a 40 year old pond on their property because the government owns the rainwater. Officials threatened to destroy a 2000 acre organic farm with an 18 year organic certification by forcibly spraying Monsanto roundup and other pesticides to kill a weed.

And in Queensland, Australia…


  • Bayer is one of four biotech giants, along with Sygenta, Dow and DuPont, who are sponsoring the ‘Agriculture in the classroom’ programme (directed at children) in Canada to push GMO pesticide propaganda. 
  • Fracking is another way that water is being used to clear people of the land by injecting toxic fluid into fractured shall rocks and poisoning groundwater supplies. You need to watch Max Igan’s videos HERE and HERE on the Australian fires to see how this works.

Again, Dr Richard Day, back in 1969:

supplies would come under tight control… Food shortages could be
created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of over
population. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the
food supply is to be brought under centralise control so that people
would have enough to be well- nourished but they would not have enough
to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had
a friend or relative who didn’t sign on, and growing ones own food
would be outlawed. This would be done under some sort of project.”

“In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything – one the ostensible purpose, and the one the ostensible purpose here  that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal.”



of the main reasons why I have not looked into Agenda 21 or Agenda
2020 is that it is directly associated with climate change denial.

Icke makes use of the concept of “problem, action, solution“. 

It is a bit of a mantra to those involved in conspiracy theory. I was
surprised to find that Google censorship has not yet gone that far

I am broadly familiar with the term 
dialectic and
have never found it used that way in philosophy – it has always been
one of 
antithesis, synthesis” 
any suggestion of something “made up” or “concocted”.

the concept does have some validity in my mind when connected with
something like 9/11 or another false flag, but I cannot find ANY
justification for its use linked with climate change.

is typical of what he has to say:

“Repetition is
the most powerful form of perception control even if you’re
repeating baloney. It’s hot – it’s global warming – it’s
cold – it’s global warming, burn the toast – it’s global
warming. Oops, no sorry that’s the Russians.” 

correctly identifies the UN climate agenda (as opposeed to cliamte change itslelf) as a “scam”. Of
this later.

quotes two of the main figures, 
one of the authors of the 2016 Paris Agreement and 
described as “one of the world’s leading experts on
climate change policy, environmental and energy policy, and energy

they talk about “saving the planet” but sometimes the cat
is let out of the bag and the real intentions are revealed.

is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting
ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of
 to change the economic development

– –
Figuerres, UN

Otmar Edenhofer: 

“We redistribute
de facto the worlds’ wealth
climate policy…c
change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s

of all,
countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world
But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s
wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will
not be enthusiastic about this.
has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate
policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with
environmental policy anymore

– – 
, former UN climate official


the Club of Rome, in the 1991 publication 
First Global Revolution

“ In
searching for anew enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and
the like would fit the bill

(NOTE: I have not read the above to confirm the quote and to find the context)

Icke maintains that climate change is nothing other than a “most powerful form of perception control” and is “baloney” and there is a combination of exploitation of natural cycles such as the el-Nino, a hiding of real intentions combined with falsification of the data.

The truth is not well-served by statements by Al Gore climate change is partly responsible for Brexitand is the  the
principal cause of the war in Syria when he knows that it was caused by militarists who are a major part of the Agenda 21 agenda

So far so good… but I can see no justification for the conclusion that “climate change is a scam”.  

Problem, reaction, solution‘ is not an appropriate concept for a situation where there is no doubt that the climate change freight train is realer than real and rather than being fake it is worse (much worse) than is being let on.

Over the 8 years that I have been following this in depth I have not found that the mainstream is trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with climate change but rather the opposite.  Any situation that I have seen and the authorities and media are trying to downplay the whole thing (just have a look at anything I have written about Radio NZ, or NIWA and the like on this.

Everything I have seen indicates that the authorities are trying to cover up (and certainly not ‘exaggerate’ the seriousness of climate change and everything that goes with it.

The sphere of human affairs can be as corrupt as you like to paint it and there is any amount of evidence of this.  However, you cannot say the same about Nature.  Even if everything the governments, the UN, the media had to say was a complete lie that would not have the slightest effect on what is happening in Nature.   

In short, Gaia does not lie.

I was looking for a stronger argument that climate change is fake but I did not find it – or anything new.

His main arguments were as follows (briefly):

  • He repeats the argument that CO2 is only a tiny part of the atmosphere and without it we would all be dead.  CO2 is a greenhouse gas – too little of it and we freeze; too much and we fry.  I have been aware of the greenhouse effect (as it relates to Venus) since approximately the age of 12. He also says it is good for plants and encourages growth – but that is anyone’s definition of a straw man argument

CO2 Makes Up Just 0.04% of Earth’s Atmosphere. Here’s Why Its Impact Is So Massive

  • He puts a lot of emphasis on claims by Dr.John Bates, a top scientist with NOAA who, in an article in the Mail on Sunday accused scientists of deliberately misleading the Paris meeting with exaggerations on global temperatures.


This article goes further into the article and confirms that he has doubled down on his accusations but is not any sort of climate change sceptic but says:

not deep fraud or anything ….It’s more a
series of biases that seem to lead in one direction.”


No Data Manipulation at NOAA

  • Another thing Icke cites to prove that the books are being cooked. According to him lower temperature records are being removed  and high temperatures are exaggerated.
  • He repeats an accusation that information on a heatwave in Australia in 1896 were removed .

Extreme heat in 1896: Panic stricken people fled the outback on special trains as hundreds die.

This is the media response.  



The Australian media is talking about it in response to the accusation but I have to admit there is no mention of it on anything can be called an encyclopedia.

This is from a list of heatwaves in Wikipedia.

  • He quotes Al Gore as saying in 2007 that the Arctic sea ice would be gone would “be gone in as little as seven years from now” and puts forward a nonsensical claim that ” the Arctic ice cap was found to have INCREASED by 43 per cent”

As a watcher of Arctic ice I can only laugh at this claim.

So, if I was to sum up David Icke and his chapter “Is it hot, or is it me?” it is a mixture of some things that are true and some fantastical conclusions that do not seem to me to be justified in the light of the evidence.

He does clearly show the fakery around much of the agenda but is completely wrong about the reality global warming. You couldn’t be more wrong.

But it turns out I have better evidence than that.


“How do you vaccum up peoples fury and redirect it into a blind alley?”

—-Arundhati Roy

Cory Morningstar is a researcher who publishes her own blog the Wrong Sort of Green.  She was a regular guest on Nature Bats Last with Guy McPherson and Mike Ferrigan until they broke up acrimoniously in 2016 over Guy’s putative stexting with a young woman in Australia.

She has also come from a background of environmental activism and came to her conclusions largely through her own personal experience.

She has written a five part article, The manufacturing of Greta Thunberg – for consent: the political economy of the non-profit industrial complex.


It is a long read and takes some time and effort to deal with the information. I have not got around reading her articles until now and it confirms most of the conclusions I have been coming to in the last year.

Greta was “found” by an organisation that looks more like a financial start-up company than an environmental organisation in Sweden called There’s No Time.

Here is their video:

Our goal is to become at least 100 million users. It is an eighth of all who have climbed on social media. Only last month we managed to reach 18 million social media accounts according to a media survey that Meltwater news made for us. At Facebook, we are currently seven times the number of followers among the world’s all climate organizations. We are growing with 10,000 new global followers per day on Facebook.” 

— Ingmar Rentzhog interview with Miljö & Utveckling, October 15, 2018

The deeper one looks the less this looks like a spontaneous “movement from below” than something that is well-planned and the goals are far from obvious.

It is hard not to be sympathetic to Greta and above all, all the young people who have joined Climate Strike.  How could you not?

what if this is not what it is about and if the whole thing is a
cynical attempt to save a faltering capitalist economy and use this
to launch a “fourth industrial revolution”?

not at all about saving the planet, nature, but is about the further
destruction of an already depleted planet?

starts her article with a quote from Japanese American sculptor,

infuriating about manipulations by the Non Profit Industrial Complex
is that they
harvest the goodwill of the people, especially young
. They target those who were not given the skills and knowledge
to truly think for themselves by institutions which are designed to
serve the ruling class. Capitalism operates systematically and
structurally like a cage to raise domesticated animals.
organizations and their projects which operate under false slogans of
humanity in order to prop up the hierarchy of money and violence are
fast becoming some of the most crucial elements of the invisible cage
of corporatism, colonialism and militarism.”

Rather than try to summarise the article myself I will share the opening from Cory’s article and suggest you look further as this is important information:

this term is quickly becoming the quote du jour as a collective
mantra to address the ongoing environmental disaster that can best be
described as a nod to the obvious, it’s true that we don’t have
We don’t have time to stop imperialist wars – wars being
the greatest contributor to climate change and environmental
degradation by far
– but we must do so. Of course this is an
impossible feat under the crushing weight of the capitalist system, a
US war economy, and the push for a fourth industrial revolution
founded on renewable energy. Yet, inconvenience has nothing to do
with necessity in regards to addressing a particular situation. What
is never discussed in regard to the so-called “clean energy
revolution” is that its existence is wholly dependent on “green”
imperialism – the latter term being synonymous with blood.

that’s not what this series is about.

series is about new financial markets in a world where global
economic growth is experiencing stagnation
. The threat and subsequent
response is not so much about climate change as it is about
collapse of the capitalist economic system.
This series is about the
climate wealth opportunity of unprecedented growth, profits, and the
measures our elite classes will take in order to achieve it –
including the exploitation of the youth.

“one kid immediately got twenty supporters” – from a Swedish
network for sustainable business. What is going on – is
the launch
of a global campaign to usher in a required consensus for the Paris
Agreement, the Green New Deal
and all climate-related policies and
legislation written by the power elite – for the power elite.
is necessary in order to unlock the trillions of dollars in funding
by way of massive public demand


agreements and policies include carbon
capture and storage (CCS),
enhanced oil recovery (EOR), bio-energy with carbon capture and
storage (BECCS), rapid total decarbonisation, payments for ecosystem
services (referred to as “natural capital”), nuclear energy and
and a host of other “solutions” that are hostile to an
already devastated planet
. What is going on – is a rebooting of a
stagnant capitalist economy, that needs new markets – new growth –
in order to save itself
. What is being created is a mechanism to
unlock approximately 90 trillion dollars for new investments and
infrastructure. What is going on is the creation of, and investment
in, perhaps the biggest behavioural change experiment yet attempted,
global in scale. And what are the deciding factors in what behaviours
global society should adhere to? And more importantly, who decides?
This is a rhetorical question, as we know full well the answer: the
same Western white male saviours and the capitalist economic system
they have implemented globally that has been the cause of our
planetary ecological nightmare. This crisis continues unabated as
they appoint themselves (yet again) as the saviours for all humanity
– a recurring problem for centuries.

Lastly, here is an article written by scientist Clive Splash about the Paris Agreement


This is so cynical that it could easily play into David Icke’s Archontic world of control of the population in the interests in the Elite.

The usual responses of “this fails to come up with solutions” or “it fosters inaction” is highly typical of what we get these days and is talked about so well by David Icke and shows that there is not a care in the world about whether this is true or not.

It is.

But it is “off-theme” and thus to be denounced by those who control and manipulate our perceptions by all the methods described above.

I have taken time to full absorb this message but it will be a difficult pill to swallow for those who have any remaining hope of solving what is a complex and multi-faceted predicament that has everything to do with the way the world is run and the way money works (in this regard Cory advises giving up listening to the NGO’s like 350.org and AVAAZ and to pay closer attention to the financial press where one can see what is really going on.


As I have found constantly the deeper one looks the worse things look – especially as Australia burns.

Here is an interview with Patrick Henningsen, who is a climate change sceptic.

Cory Morningstar on the Subversion of the Climate Crisis ‘Rebellion

And with Derrick Jensen who is not.

Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Cory Morningstar – April 3, 2016


This is the petition I will NOT be signing.

People respond very understandably by signing such petitions.  They are doing so out of the very best of motivations; they really want to make a difference.

There have been calls for a climate emergency for a long time, to take the climate emergency seriously.

But the worst thing about the world we live in is that over 99% of the population has been totally disempowered so we have been reduced to watching this dystopia from the sidelines.

Cory Morningstar (and also, to some extent David Icke) demonstrate why signing this petition is a waste of time. Essentially they are asking our leaders to respond to the emergency with everything that has been discussed above.

We are talking about a climate emergency. THEY are talking about a fourth industrial revolution.

Unfortunately, people do not like being told that their not-so-well-thought-out emotional responses are to no avail and are likely to round on the messenger, the bearer of truth.

That is exactly what I would expect in this case.

4 thoughts on “Looking at the evidence of “Agenda 21″and the climate change hoax

  1. Thanks for digging into Cory's work. Much appreciated, as is all the work you do on this blog.

  2. Thank you so much Robin. I've finally managed to read and listen to everything you have posted on this Climate Change topic and am so appreciative of what you have been able to research and reveal with all your hard work. Although I was captured for a while, by digging deeper into the corruption and manipulation and spending time joining the dots between the Military Industrial Complex, the Central Banking Monetary system and now the NGO Industrial Complex, I can finally understand why Cory says until you really understand how the system works our actions are pointless and benefit only the system. That the environmental and climate movements have been totally hijacked is now glaringly obvious. If we allow technologies such as Geoengineering and 5G to be introduced as solutions to Climate Change we are completing the sequence that leads to the enslavement and demise of most of the worlds population and the commodification of nature.

    1. Mike Ruppert went from "until you change the way money works you change nothing" to "three guarantors of human extinction".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial