Maria Zakharova talks to Komsomolskaya Pravda

Maria Zakharova talks to Komsomolskaya Pravda

That triumvirate of Vladimir  Putin, Sergei Lavrov and Maria Zakharova run rings around any of their western counterparts!

They seem positively dim by comparison.

Here Maria Zakharova addresses the Liz Truss story.

Maria Zakharova: The Western elite is now being shuffled like a deck of marked cards
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry on radio “KP” talked about the hacked phone of Liz Truss, the West’s income from the grain deal and her expectations from the US elections

Мария Захарова: Западную элиту сейчас тасуют как колоду крапленых карт

The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova , became a guest of Komsomolskaya Pravda Radio . Here is the text version of the conversation.

WHOSE JOB IS DONE?

– Maria, the first question is about the message allegedly sent by former British Prime Minister Liz Truss to Anthony Blinken, head of the US State Department, a minute after the Nord Stream sabotage was committed. And this message, translated into Russian, literally meant the following: “It’s done.” Is it really so vulgar that the Anglo-Saxons were pierced? How confident is the Foreign Ministry that it was they who were behind this sabotage?

– About the so-called SMS. For about three days now, the British press has been shocked by the information that Liz Truss, at the time when she was prime minister, had her phone hacked. They immediately gave that these, of course, were Russian hackers. That is, the British audience had to pass by – what exactly was in these very materials from Liz Truss’s phone. Amazing story, right? No, wait a minute. Let’s figure out what is there.

And then something interesting began. Over the past 24 hours, information has begun to circulate in the Internet that among the revealed information was exactly the same message that you are talking about – “It’s done.” Let me emphasize once again that this data began to circulate in the media environment. What am I doing? I ask London a direct question – did British Prime Minister Liz Truss send a message to the US Secretary of State immediately after the explosion of the gas pipeline with such content. What do you think the Western mass media, which we have declared to be foreign agents, are doing right away? They immediately publish an article that Russia is spreading fakes. No, wait a minute, we don’t attribute anything to anyone. We don’t distribute anything. We officially, having seen the message, ask the question: “Tell me, was it really or not?” This is an open, honest, professional question.

Let me remind you how the British behave. Do you remember when Theresa May was the Prime Minister of Britain? As soon as she received incomprehensible information that some people were walking around somewhere in the Salisbury area. “Highley Likely”, they are very similar to those who could be involved in the fact that he carried out an attack on Britain – no less – with a chemical warfare agent. This is just fake. And our question is direct and open.

– You did communicate directly with Liz Truss, right?

– I would ask us not to unite on any basis.

– The President recently called her “a girl a little crazy.” This fits a little into the story that is now going through the media – that she could …

– No, the question here is not that she is a girl or someone else. Here the question is that the statements that she makes are from the category of crazy. You will remember how she said she would use nuclear weapons, if anything. It’s because she didn’t finish her studies. But in fact, this is a big question for the inflated myth of British education – here we see a bright representative, the British Prime Minister, who does not know where which seas are and who freely talks about the use of nuclear weapons. But the problem is much broader. This is a crisis of the Western system as it is. No one chose Liz Truss as prime minister. Can you imagine? Here we are now talking about the model, as they call themselves Western democracy. Nobody chose her. That is, the British did not vote for it either directly or indirectly. That is,

– As well as Rishi Sunak, who came to replace her.

– This deck of marked cards is shuffled the way the political elite wants it. We are accustomed to the fact that the word “elite” is always used in some highest sense. But in reality, this is not the case now.

NUMBERS MANIPULATION

– The President stressed that Russia did not withdraw from the grain deal, but only suspended it. What kind of guarantees do we expect from Ukraine and is there any progress on the other side to give them?

– Some time ago, all the world’s media, at the suggestion of, of course, the US State Department, the White House, the British Foreign Office, began to shout that world food security is in danger. There was a classic world-class PR company, behind which stood those who made huge money on this, both on the PR company itself and on this very food. The UN Secretary General came to the fore in this situation a few months ago and proposed a package deal. The passage of Ukrainian food should be unblocked and at the same time Russian fertilizers and agricultural products will also be able to get some promotion on world markets. And since this initiative comes from the UN Secretary General, everyone should believe in it, because he is like an honest broker.

Relevant agreements were actually concluded. Only then did some very interesting facts begin to emerge. Firstly, only the first part of the deal worked, which ensured the promotion of Ukrainian food to these very world markets. Secondly, none of the poorest, neediest and starving countries began to receive it. All this began to come to the so-called western base. That is, to private Western offices, companies that made huge money on this.

But you can’t do anything against numbers! Although there are manipulations with numbers.

Let me quote you a representative of the US State Department, Mr. Price. He stated literally the following at a briefing on October 31: “As of yesterday, over 9.5 million tons of grain and other food products were transported from Ukrainian ports as part of the initiative, a total of about four hundred flights. The vast majority of wheat exported under this initiative – 66% or two-thirds – went to developing countries. Moreover, 19% of these 9.5 million tons were sent to the least developed countries of the world.”

How interesting! It’s just tears welling up in our eyes, what disinterested, pure and sincere people the employees of the US State Department are. You know how – I can’t eat, just let others feed. Look at how cleverly concepts are being substituted before our eyes. 9.5 million grains and other food products – corn, sunflower seeds, soybeans, rapeseed, sunflower oil. All this is substituted for wheat alone, which gives percentage excerpts that coincide with the convenient picture of the UN structures. But according to UN data, a slightly different figure for the volume of wheat exports from Ukraine appears as part of the implementation of the grain deal. This is 2.3 million tons. Or 30% of all deliveries, not 9.5 million, as Price said. Wonderful, is it true? And about the distribution of the remaining seven million tons of food, Price does not want to say anything at all.

And it would have to. Here in the same UN report, the volume of corn supplies under the grain deal is 3.3 million tons. 68% of them are exported to developed countries. Not developing, but developed. 68%. And only the rest, that is, only a third – to developing countries. Do you know how many for the poorest? Zero.

You know, it’s like that every day. The second part is even scarier. This is what happened early in the morning of October 29, when, under the cover of a humanitarian operation, the armed forces of Ukraine, led by British specialists, they tried to strike at our ships, which provided this very food deal. When asked – who do you want guarantees from? Yes, from everyone who signed up for this deal. And first of all from the United Nations, which acted as an intermediary and guarantor, and offered these schemes itself. And we need to make sure that all those who are behind the Kyiv regime, as long as they are the beneficiaries of this very grain deal, understand that no such provocations, and this is no longer a provocation – this is a terrorist act – will no longer take place.

AMERICAN THINGS

– Our conversation takes place on the eve of one of the main political events of the year: everyone is waiting for the results of the elections in America. It is expected that the Republicans will replace the Democrats in one, and perhaps in both houses of the US Congress. Will it become easier for Russia to negotiate with America? Does it really matter to us who wins there, or do we not care?

– We do not have and should not have any expectations from internal electoral processes in other countries. This is their story, first and foremost. And in the US, this is the story of the degradation of the electoral system, and the political system too. Because it is directly based on elections. Here’s how they conduct elections, it’s impossible to film in any movie. Because it is a much more exciting and disgusting picture.

I think that the 2020 elections will definitely go down in the textbooks of both the United States and other countries as one of the dirtiest and most dishonest. But after every election, presidential, and now even to the US Legislative Assembly, investigations are carried out in America, it all ends with the wildest scandals, each time conclusions are drawn that the next elections should be held somehow differently. By the way, they also adopt various acts, statements, declarations at the legislative level that restrict politicians from using dirty methods: either they somehow tried to limit finances that go to election campaigns, or technologies … They try to do something, but every time it gets dirtier and dirtier all these campaigns. And 2020 was not even a failure, but a moment of self-disclosure. So let the American voter deal with it to the extent that

We do not exaggerate the importance of the elections in the context of bilateral relations, given the persistent Russophobic spirit that has developed in the Capitol. But, of course, we monitor the course of the campaign, because some things are really just extraordinary in their illegitimacy, in their blatant anti-democratic nature.

I am sure that everyone notices that the closer the November 8 vote is, the more chaotic movements, wild mutual accusations, rudeness, rudeness, forgeries, tricks, etc. begin in America. Everything is already in this dump – business, public figures, journalists. Everything is mixed up. It’s just a scary story! And the reason is clear. Many people think that the failures of domestic and foreign policy, economic problems … Yes, that’s not the point! This is a systemic crisis. The Americans simply cannot do anything about it, because first there must be a moment of recognition, acceptance, fixation that something needs to be corrected. But since they are always trying to correct something outside, then, apparently, their hands do not reach themselves. So, I don’t know how everything will go there now. But it’s funny, really.

– Will American financial and military support for Ukraine continue? Republican candidates have said more than once that America’s domestic problems will be more important to them. Is there a chance that after the change of power, Washington will simply forget about Kyiv?

– Everyone looks at particulars, but you need to look globally. Yes, probably, domestic American problems will someday be of more concern to American politicians. Even now they are interested in them, but they cannot solve them for many years and instead use an external factor – some kind of aggressive actions, then provocations and intrigues, then staged and staged. And we’ve been talking about this for a long time. Look: in a huge number of interviews, speeches, and press conferences, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov noted that, unfortunately, the electoral cycle that begins every two years with the Americans – either the presidential election or the Congress – puts the whole world and all international relations in the position of a hostage of internal American problems. Little pranks like Watergate or Monica Lewinsky’s dress are no longer enough for Washington to to deal with internal disassembly. Such factors simply ceased to suffice. And globally, this trend manifested itself in a completely frenzied format, perhaps under Obama, who made Russophobia part of his global strategy. Remember – spy mania, inventing some non-existent stories or giving existing ones an absolutely incredible fiction in terms of scale … First it was before the presidential campaigns, then during, then immediately after them. For some reason, they suddenly decided to punish Russia for interfering in the American presidential election and took away five properties from it, which – attention! – were taken away because they were allegedly almost nests of espionage! And I know one of these so-called “nests” well. It’s Riverdale, near New York in the summer, a camp was opened there for the children of Russian diplomats and compatriots; events for foreign colleagues were also held there, our employees rested there. Viewed territory from all sides, where receptions, celebrations, even football matches were held. And this is what the Obama administration passed off as a spy nest. She issued and stated that, they say, everything, now we will live happily, because we have covered the Russian spy network. It was this story that blinded everyone in the United States, turned into the main strong point of the Democrats, and Russophobia became a long-playing trump card for them. that’s it, now we’ll have fun, because we covered the Russian spy network. It was this story that blinded everyone in the United States, turned into the main strong point of the Democrats, and Russophobia became a long-playing trump card for them. that’s it, now we’ll have fun, because we covered the Russian spy network. It was this story that blinded everyone in the United States, turned into the main strong point of the Democrats, and Russophobia became a long-playing trump card for them.

EUROPEAN SUSPICIONS

– It’s no secret that the States have adapted to solve their internal problems at someone else’s expense, so that Russia, as well as China, in American political doctrines are referred to only as hostile states. Europe, it seems, is an American ally, but it seems that they began to suspect something there …

– Suspect that something went wrong. May “Eugene Onegin” help us: “Winter. Europe, triumphant, renews the path on the firewood … “. Forgive me for changing these lines a little, but it’s getting colder in Europe. And the cold activates brain activity – you think how to warm up, what is needed for this. By the way, many ethnographers believe that climate change, seasonal phases have always contributed to the development of industry and production. It’s getting colder – people are starting to think. When it was warmer, they were in a more relaxed state. But it was warmer not only in summer in Europe, it was last winter and the year before last. Because the gas was Russian, cheap, and life somehow developed. And the garden that Borrell spoke of continued to bloom. And now something has gone wrong: someone has blown up a gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea, and it has become cooler. The blood rushed to the brain, and the Europeans began to think – what is wrong with them, what are their allies doing with them, with the Europeans, does the Anglo-Saxon duo perform the parts correctly, as they call themselves? So the attempts began, everyone began to look for an answer to this question. Although he is on the surface. The centers of the world have become great competitors for Washington and London. And we have been talking about this for many years. We talked about the fact that the euro has become a competitor to the dollar, moreover, a real competitor. After all, the dollar is being printed somewhere, and an incredible 31 trillion is now the US national debt. And the dollar is not backed by anything other than this debt. It just keeps printing. They just took 6 billion and threw in unsecured money. In what economy would this pass without consequences? Only if you manage everything else manually and by force. And here is the European Union with its single currency, which is backed by the economies, resources, and capabilities of dozens of countries. So the euro has become a colossal competitor. But it was impossible to talk about it aloud. Russia and China have also become competitors – they both have the resources, and they have not only growth prospects, but also objective indicators. That is why Russia and China were declared the main threats by the Americans. And the European Union has simply become a real threat. By the way, this is also the answer to the question – why did the UK leave the European Union? We must pay tribute to the British – they have amazing scenography. Everything about their dramatizations is brilliantly played parts from the point of view of external perception. And they held Brexit at the highest level. So the euro has become a colossal competitor. But it was impossible to talk about it aloud. Russia and China have also become competitors – they both have the resources, and they have not only growth prospects, but also objective indicators. That is why Russia and China were declared the main threats by the Americans. And the European Union has simply become a real threat. By the way, this is also the answer to the question – why did the UK leave the European Union? We must pay tribute to the British – they have amazing scenography. Everything about their dramatizations is brilliantly played parts from the point of view of external perception. And they held Brexit at the highest level. So the euro has become a colossal competitor. But it was impossible to talk about it aloud. Russia and China have also become competitors – they both have the resources, and they have not only growth prospects, but also objective indicators. That is why Russia and China were declared the main threats by the Americans. And the European Union has simply become a real threat. By the way, this is also the answer to the question – why did the UK leave the European Union? We must pay tribute to the British – they have amazing scenography. Everything about their dramatizations is brilliantly played parts from the point of view of external perception. And they held Brexit at the highest level. That is why Russia and China were declared the main threats by the Americans. And the European Union has simply become a real threat. By the way, this is also the answer to the question – why did the UK leave the European Union? We must pay tribute to the British – they have amazing scenography. Everything about their dramatizations is brilliantly played parts from the point of view of external perception. And they held Brexit at the highest level. That is why Russia and China were declared the main threats by the Americans. And the European Union has simply become a real threat. By the way, this is also the answer to the question – why did the UK leave the European Union? We must pay tribute to the British – they have amazing scenography. Everything about their dramatizations is brilliantly played parts from the point of view of external perception. And they held Brexit at the highest level.

And we all perfectly understand why this was done and at whose behest. There was a long-term plan for how to slow down the growth and development of the European Union, throw it back as a competitor many, many years ago. But for the final thunderous applause, it was necessary to deprive the Europeans of the main thing – a cheap and reliable resource, which was Russian gas. At the very least, the Republicans tried to do this by political means, well, a little by threats and blackmail, but under the Democrats, Biden and Nuland simply came out and said, well, stop coddling with this Nord Stream, we will close this project anyway. But as? By any means they said! That’s all clear – and about the partnership, and about the alliance. For some time, Europeans will have to spend on this awareness and understand everything exactly. Why? Because it’s impossible to believe. They have been zombified for so many years by words about some kind of strategic alliance and unity, liberal values. It does not matter that there is nothing left of liberalism, since everything was achieved by force, intrigue, blackmail, extremism, and now terrorism. But propaganda did its job, working at full capacity. With what fervor they repeated and repeated the amazing word – solidarity! But it is surprising that their solidarity was awakened only in an anti-Russian vein. She was not on any other issue. In all other directions – like a swan, cancer and pike. working at full capacity. With what fervor they repeated and repeated the amazing word – solidarity! But it is surprising that their solidarity was awakened only in an anti-Russian vein. She was not on any other issue. In all other directions – like a swan, cancer and pike. working at full capacity. With what fervor they repeated and repeated the amazing word – solidarity! But it is surprising that their solidarity was awakened only in an anti-Russian vein. She was not on any other issue. In all other directions – like a swan, cancer and pike.

EUROPE AND ALL OTHER

– So, Europe is naive. Countries from other continents and continents will be more perspicacious. Take Saudi Arabia…

– If we talk about the Middle Eastern countries, they act in a national capacity: they have their own foreign policy, they are sovereign players in international affairs, they have their own constitution, their own doctrinal base, concept, etc. They understand what they will do tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. And the European Union – attention, fanfare! – it has a single foreign policy, and there are dozens of member countries in it. I was a witness when the foreign minister of one of the countries of Northern Europe, which is part of the EU, at a press conference refused to answer a question about foreign policy, citing the fact that only a representative from the Brussels headquarters could comment on it. What is it like? It seems to be a sovereign country, part of the European Union, which was actually organized on an economic platform. It was an alliance centered on the economy, in the center of not only abbreviations, but also the essence of the association itself. And now they are being told – no, you do not form your own foreign policy.

And so it happens with everything. But the states are sovereign, with all the signs of sovereignty – constitutions, borders, etc. They even have their own internal agenda for election campaigns on foreign policy issues. That is, they tell their voters about their foreign policy priorities. But as soon as the so-called elections are held, everything, their foreign policy and position in the international arena becomes unified, and only Brussels can somehow shape it. Let me remind you: 2014, Ukraine. The role of Brussels was colossal there at that time. And who at that time was in charge of all foreign policy affairs in the European Union? Catherine Ashton, Baroness. Where is she from? From Britain. So they messed up then on the Maidan so that the whole of Europe is still disentangling, and London is already looking at all this outside the European Union.

The countries that all their lives have received (if not to say raked) from Western democracies because they do not have the opportunity to show themselves as truly free, that they do not listen to their people to the extent necessary, are not, to paraphrase Bulgakov, with the freshness of democracy, which is really necessary, in fact turned out to be much more democratic and much more sovereign and independent, reflecting the real will of their people in international affairs, than old Europe. That is why the European Union is now thinking about how to live on. At the same time, no one cares about people there – how they will drown, how they will warm themselves.

How they will develop is the question. And the Europeans were forced to admit, inside themselves (though it just so happened that everyone else knew about it), that now everyone in the European Union will need to understand how to build their economic development, since plans for an accelerated pace of such and in general any -the pace was untenable. And all because there is no main thing – there is no resource. As it was before? After all, the resources were there before. So they took them from the colonies, took them out for centuries, used them and developed on this. And so it turned out a flowering garden, which, I will remind you once again, Borrell said. And now there is nothing to water this blooming garden.

– And the rest of the world Borrell called the jungle …

– We live in an amazing time. Times are hard, interesting, exciting, different. But now they are amazing, because we would not have come up with such things for them. That is, we would not be able to bring the West to clean water as much as they bring themselves out in their revelations. This is how to admit to the use of colonial logic – they say, there are beautiful and wonderful metropolises, but there are all the others. What Borrell gave out, no one would have formulated. Did someone write this to him, or did he come up with it himself? Mystery. But he said it. And received the reaction of the entire international community. As usual, then he repented or tried to repent… But this phrase of his has already gone down in history.

AMAZING TIMES

– Any conflict sooner or later ends at the negotiating table. When and what compromises will Ukraine be ready for? What compromises will Russia not make?

– Now we need to talk, first of all, about logic, about common sense, about those basic values ​​of humanity, by which we are all guided. I’m talking about our country, which, in terms of these values, will be supported by the majority in the world. I emphasize – the majority. Yes, indeed, the main media resources are now concentrated in the hands of the Western minority, as well as a considerable amount of financial resources, due to which they form the perception of what is happening there, incl. and in Ukraine. But we see the fantastic reaction of those who are called the jungle in the West. Independent, sovereign, dignified, honest and courageous. And brave, not because they were intimidated and told them – if you support Russia now, we will bring down your economy. After all, many were threatened differently: they were told – if you now take an anti-Russian position, we will help you get out of those difficulties in which you are. But they did not succumb to either one or the other. Look: the African continent. Or Asia. Not the Asia that Japan represents, but the real one. Not the site for American bases, not the people who forgot who dropped the atomic bomb on them and now attribute the nuclear threat to us at commemorative ceremonies in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. No, not that Asia, but the real one, true to its history, its own and universal values. Asians told everyone else – no, we decide how and with whom we will communicate. And this is the most important thing now. who dropped an atomic bomb on them and are now ascribing a nuclear threat to us at commemorative ceremonies in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. No, not that Asia, but the real one, true to its history, its own and universal values. Asians told everyone else – no, we decide how and with whom we will communicate. And this is the most important thing now. who dropped an atomic bomb on them and are now ascribing a nuclear threat to us at commemorative ceremonies in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. No, not that Asia, but the real one, true to its history, its own and universal values. Asians told everyone else – no, we decide how and with whom we will communicate. And this is the most important thing now.

What is happening now is of tremendous importance for the historical context. This is the most important key stage in the development of mankind, not only in this era at the turn of the two centuries, not in the continuation of the history of the twentieth century, but in principle. Because if we hadn’t rebelled against what was being imposed on us, then I’m not sure that one could talk in principle about preserving the high civilizational ideals that humanity is so proud of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial
RSS