About 20 years I became aware of a controversy involving the late immunologist, Jacques Benveniste and the weird methods used by the journal, Nature to debunk his research using a magician, James Randi.
You can see the background to the story here.
The concept of the memory of water goes back to 1988 when the late Professor Jacques Benveniste published, in the international scientific journal Nature, claims that extremely high ‘ultramolecular’ dilutions of an antibody had effects in the human basophil degranulation test, a laboratory model of immune response.
In other words, the water diluent ‘remembered’ the antibody long after it was gone. His findings were subsequently denounced as ‘pseudoscience’ and yet, despite the negative impact this had at the time, the idea has not gone away.
In a special issue of Homeopathy, scientists from the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, USA as well as the UK present remarkably convergent views from groups using entirely different methods, indicating that large-scale structural effects can occur in liquid water, and can increase with time. Such effects might account for claims of memory of water effects. (source: Elsevier)
Here is the entire documentary
Nobel Laureate Says Water has a Memory
According to Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, water is able to duplicate the qualities of any material with which it once interfaced. Numerous other scientists and researchers also have found water to possess the innate capacity to retain a memory of the molecular properties of any substance it once contained. This notion that water has memory, however, is strongly rejected as “pseudoscience” within the mainstream scientific community, as is its related practice of homeopathy.
Homeopathy’s misconception as a so-called pseudoscience depends, in part, on a narrow-minded refusal within the mainstream scientific community to entertain at least two unconventional but substantive ideas:
1) Water has mysterious and relatively little understood properties, including the abilities to store, broadcast and amplify the informational data (i.e., morphic) fields of any substance with which it comes into contact.
2) All substance/form has a non-physical (i.e., subtle) informational data field (i.e., morphic field) from which the informational blueprint of that material can be extracted and stored in another medium.
Our work at Subtle Energy Sciences (SES) very strongly affirms these two ideas, as we’ve witnessed these phenomena time and time again over the last seven years in ways that rule out the possibility of a mere placebo effect. Many of the energetic signatures we prepare are first imprinted onto water and digitally sampled afterward, since water acts as a wonderful medium for storing and transferring subtle information, proving water retains memory.
The following video features the groundbreaking, water-memory work of Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier, who explores the deep question: does water have memory? He demonstrates how the informational signal of virus DNA can be captured in water and transformed into a digital signal that can be emailed to another computer on the other side of the world. The digital file is received by this distant computer and used to reconstitute the virus DNA in a glass of water. This is related our work here at SES in that we also digitally capture and transfer energetic signatures of substances that have been recorded using the subtle memory-storage capacity of water.