REPOSTED: My resource on Covid-19 and the “vaccines”

REPOSTED: My resource on Covid-19 and the “vaccines”

I am reposting this after making some minor changes and improvements. I was contacted by Vanessa Beeley who has republished what I did with a few improvements.

I must say I was delighted with this course of events: it is a rare example of solidarity and collaboration that I do not see very often. I often feel very alone in this.

It made me smile well into the evening!

Q&A: a resource on covid-19 and vaccination

The following is a set of questions that I have put together for those who are still “sitting on the fence” and who might be persuaded to do their own research. It is, for that reason more conservative than my own personal position.

I hope that you will take this as a resource that you can share with your friends and relatives.

I am emailing it out to everyone I know.


I have been following this for some time and feeling rather uncomfortable about what I was hearing. A video by a rest home worker in the US with a heartfelt cry saying his residents were “droppin like flies” shortly after taking the vaccine made me decide I cannot stay silent

So, I just want to pose the same questions I have asked myself over the past months and invite you to do the research yourself and find your own answers.  I do not wish  to persuade you of any one viewpoint.  I think they are important questions.

Mostly, we get our information from TV sound bites and newspaper articles that do not provide context and often contradict each other, r so we do not get the chance to ask questions.

When we do ask the questions it is often hard to find answers. It takes quite a lot of research as well as a good memory.

I have put in red the items I think warrant a close look

If you find the following useful I would suggest you share it with your friends and ask them to share it with their friends.

If you do not just let it rest there.


When covid-19 began to dominate the headlines from March, 2020 there was a lot of reference to testing but on searching I could not find any answers to my questions of what it was and what does it measure?  The only answers to the question came from people completely outside the mainstream. This situation has changed quite a bit over the months but to this day the one place I cannot get information is in this country.

We keep hearing that people have tested positive for covid-19. But what does that really mean

Here are some of my questions:

  • What Is A Covid-19 case?

This is from a (non-practising) GP, Sam Bailey, from Christchurch

  • What does the test pick up?

Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus’

WHO Changes PCR Test Criteria To Cover-up False Positives

The following video is one of the very best explanations that I have come across and comes from a (presumably retired) vice-President of the Pfizer corporation who has impeccable qualifications and yet has been totally censored by the media and social media.

Ex Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon Blows The Whistle

  • Why does this test have to be administered via a catheter up the nose practically to the brain stem,  when it is known that other much less-invasive techniques (such as saliva tests) that provide quick answers have not been taken up? In case you don’t know, the PCR test is administered by deep insertion of a cotton wool swab with a twisting motion


In recent days the Chinese have even come up with a test via anal swab.

The test is highly invasive and involves the insertion of a long cotton wool swab in a rotating motion.

  • Why are amplifications of up to 40 times needed, something that could imply that any number of people in the community might have “covid-19”?

The Trouble With PCR Tests

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.

  • What is the level of accuracy and how many “false positives” are there?

An “alternative” view”

Your Coronavirus PCR Test is Positive – You Still Might Not Have Covid-19, Exposing Unwelcome Truths About the Deep Flaws of PCR Testing

  • Why are we not being told about the warnings about the limitations of the PCR test that are on the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) sites.

The extent to which a positive PCR result correlates with the infectious state of an individual is still being determined.”…There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”

There is also such a warning on the CDC site but not in the NZ MoH site.

  • Why have the number of reported influenza cases decreased to historically low levels when common sense dictates this is scarcely possible

Flu is ‘almost wiped out’ and at lowest level in 130 Years

  • Why have deaths due to “other causes”, such as heart attack or even car accidents having “covid-19” put as a cause of death if the person had had a positive covid-19 test?

CDC Now Admits that 94% of COVID Deaths had “Another Cause of Death”

At the outset of the pandemic, the CDC had been instructed to change the methodology regarding Death Certificates with a view to artificially inflating the numbers of “Covid deaths”:

Conditions contributing to deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), by age group and state, United States:

Covid-19: Questionable Policies, Manipulated Rules of Data Collection and Reporting. Is It Safe for Students to Return to School?

US Hospitals Getting Paid More to Label Cause of Death as ‘Coronavirus’:

  • Why are doctors ascribing so many conditions to covid-19?

I’ve signed death certificates during Covid-19. Here’s why you can’t trust any of the statistics on the number of victims

US Hospitals Getting Paid More to Label Cause of Death as ‘Coronavirus’:

  • Why did the Nobel Prize inventor of the PCR test, Kerri Mullis say the PCR test should not be used for diagnosis?


PCR Inventor: “It doesn’t tell you that you are sick”

The entire video is here

The mainstream media have been going all out trying to pretend this never happened, turns out it did.

Why are qualified virologists and epidemiologists being ignored or even censored?

Plan B  (Simon Thornley of Auckland University and others)

Dr. Yardley Yeadon:

Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus’


  • Why are comments from qualified and practising virologists and epidemiologists, as well as doctors not being listened to, and dismissed as “conspiracy theory” or disinformation?

Plan B ( Simon Thornley from Auckland University)

WHO Changes PCR Test Criteria To Cover-up False Positives?

  • And what about flu shots?

Covid 19 coronavirus: Flu vaccination strongly recommended during Covid-19:


KENNEDY: Pentagon Study Shows Flu Shot Raises Risk Of Coronavirus By 36%, And There’s More:



  • What is the vaccine?

It appears to be a fait accompli

New Zealand gives provisional approval to Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine:

It’s Gene Therapy, not a vaccine – Dr. David Martin:


Neither the Pfizer nor the Moderna “vaccine” is a vaccine – they describe it 

as gene therapy.

Robert F. Kennedy on the vaccine and pathogenic priming:

obert F. Kennedy Jr. on pathogenic primingRobert F.nnedy Jr. on pathogenic primingRobert F. Kennedy Jr. on pathogenic priming

PFIZER: Gene therapy: research, treatments and manufacturing:

MODERNA: Why does Moderna describe their product as “gene therapy”, and not a vaccine:

The AstraZenica vaccine is actually a vaccine.

An Overview of the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine:

Aussie scientists cast doubt on low-efficacy AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine:

They have never produced a vaccine before.

  • How do COVID-19 vaccines compare with other existing vaccines?

The clearest explanation I have found is this that explains that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are not what the media and popular explanations say. If you look at the material from both Pfizer and Moderna they describe their products as “gene therapy” and is an experimental medicine that has either developed in undue haste or was already been developed. As best as I can ascertain the Oxford AstraZenica vaccine is what they say it is, albeit with some caveats.

  • Is the vaccine compulsory?

Coronavirus: High-risk workers who don’t get vaccine could lose job – employment lawyer:

  • Can I still catch covid-19 after having the vaccine?

You can still catch the virus:

  • What are the chances of adverse effects?

There is a 10 to 15% chance of getting adverse effects from taking the vaccine:

Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus:

America’s top coronavirus doctor warns vaccines could make Covid-19 worse:

SUBJECT: The Covid vaccine should be avoided at all costs:

Robert F Kennedy on pathogenic priming:

Covid vaccine side effects ‘significantly noticeable’ in up to 15% of recipients:

Moderna’s COVID vaccine causing bizarre side effects. 

Phenomenon appears about a week after receiving a dose:

Pfizer COVID vaccine trial shows alarming evidence of pathogenic priming in older adults:

  • Why have adverse effects and deaths being covered up?

Excess deaths associated with COVID-19:

Here’s how the media is misreporting COVID-19’s death toll in America:

Covid 19 coronavirus: US death toll hits 200,000:

  • The media says there has been no vaccine damage – is this true?

  • I have been told that the vaccine can lead to infertility but the media says otherwise. Is this true?

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is female sterilisation

This is an article penned by Dr. Yeadon that appeared in the UK Daily Mail.

DR MIKE YEADON:Three facts No 10’s experts got wrong:

And this is what Dr. Yeadon says about covid-19 in general

Despite that this is what the media says: 

Debunked: No, Pfizer’s head of research did not say the Covid vaccine is ‘female sterilisation’:

Mainstream Media Urges Men to Freeze Sperm Before Getting COVID-19 Vaccine Due to Infertility Concerns:


  • Have the vaccine manufacturers been given indemnity, and if it is safe and effective, why?

  • Are they experimenting with people?

UK launches ‘world first’ trial mixing different Covid vaccines for first and second doses:

Why the haste? Most vaccines take 10 years or so to get approval. This is experimental. Why have they jumped animal testing and are testing on humans?

  • Do I need to still wear a mask or socially distance after taking the vaccine?

 You must still socially distance after taking the vaccine:

  • Do I have to repeat the vaccine?



Astra Zenica

  • Why do you need to wear two or even three masks?

Dr Fauci says it’s ‘possible’ CDC will recommend double-masking:

He later flip-flopped from his position:

COVID-19: Triple-layer masks now recommended,what does that mean for Albertans?

  • A higher chance of HIV infection?!

  • Can flu disappear through social distancing?. Does this make sense?

Flu is ‘almost wiped out’ and at lowest level in 130 YEARS:

  • Flu vaccine has been shown to increase the chances of infection by sars-coV-2  by 33%. Why push it?

This is a little-known piece of research cited by Robert F.Kennedy Jr indicating that people in the US military are 36% more prone to being infected with covid=19.


KENNEDY: Pentagon Study Shows Flu Shot Raises Risk Of Coronavirus By 36%, And There’s More:

What follows are some of the more important statements I have come across recently about covid-19 and the vaccines

Mike Yeadon has the perfect credentials and what he says corresponds with the information I got about the immune system while training to be an acupuncturist as opposed to what I get from the media. This is worth, to my mind,  a very close listen.

  1. Ex Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon Blows The Whistle

  1. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on pathogenic priming

Dr.Martin explains the vaccine in a way that is both credible and understandable to anyone.

  1. It’s Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine – with Dr. David Martin


    Robin Westenra · It’s Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine – with Dr. David Martin

This was the video that helped me decide that I could not remain silent. It is a passionate and honest account of a nursing home assistant who decided he could not remain silent but talk of all the deaths that have occured after vaccination of residents whereas in the past year there have been zero deaths.

For me it is sad that these very credible voices are being silenced to the extent they have to seek alternative platforms instead of being part of an open debate.


Here is an abbreviated version


The following is a hard-hitting, much-censored UK documentary on Covid-19 and what it means for us.

If you find the following useful I would suggest you share it with your friends and ask them to share it with their friends.

If you do not just let it rest there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial