RUSSIA GIVES ULTIMATUM TO NATO
11:00 AM EST – 14 December 2021 — Russia has given the West/NATO an ultimatum and a date by which all its security demands pertaining to Ukraine should be met. If not, a military option will be taken by Russia.
Ukraine’s Kyiv has begun organizing civil defense/drills as well as recruiting reservists.
This is a fast-developing story, check back for updates. . .
UPDATE 12:15 PM EST —
On December 10, just four (4) days ago, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia issued the public statement below.
Less than eight (8) hours later, NATO officially responded “no.”
The information I have today is that Russia has re-issued that statement to NATO, only this time, it has a date-certain for resolution, with the additional component of using military force if the situation is not resolved by that date.
Here is the December 10 statement issued by Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
Foreign Ministry statement on dialogue with the United States and other Western countries regarding security guarantees
We note US President Joseph Biden’s readiness expressed at the December 7, 2021 talks with President Vladimir Putin to establish a serious dialogue on issues related to ensuring the security of the Russian Federation. Such a dialogue is urgently needed today when the relations between Russia and the collective West continue to decay and have approached a critical line. At the same time, numerous loose interpretations of our position have emerged in recent days. In this connection we feel it is necessary to once again clarify the following.
Escalating a confrontation with our country is absolutely unacceptable. As a pretext, the West is using the situation in Ukraine, where it embarked on encouraging Russophobia and justifying the actions of the Kiev regime to undermine the Minsk agreements and prepare for a military scenario in Donbass.
Instead of reigning in their Ukrainian protégés, NATO countries are pushing Kiev towards aggressive steps. There can be no alternative interpretation of the increasing number of unplanned exercises by the United States and its allies in the Black Sea. NATO members’ aircraft, including strategic bombers, regularly make provocative flights and dangerous manoeuvres in close proximity to Russia’s borders. The militarisation of Ukraine’s territory and pumping it with weapons are ongoing.
The course has been chosen of drawing Ukraine into NATO, which is fraught with the deployment of strike missile systems there with a minimal flight time to Central Russia, and other destabilising weapons. Such irresponsible behaviour creates grave military risks for all parties involved, up to and including a large-scale conflict in Europe.
At the same time, statements are made that the issue of Ukraine’s hypothetical NATO membership concerns exclusively Kiev and the Alliance, and that nobody should interfere in this process. Let us recall, however, that NATO countries, apart from the Washington Treaty, have obligations regarding the indivisible security in the Euro-Atlantic and the entire OSCE space. This principle was initially proclaimed in the Helsinki Final Act and was later reaffirmed in the Charter of Paris for a New Europe of 1990, which states: “Security is indivisible and the security of every participating State is inseparably linked to that of all the others”, whereas in 1999, The Charter for European Security was adopted at the OSCE Istanbul summit, which stressed that the participating States “will not strengthen their security at the expense of the security of other States.”
All these documents were signed by the leaders of the OSCE member-states, including all NATO countries. However, in violation of the principle of indivisible security – as well as in violation of the promises given to the Soviet leaders – NATO has been persistently moving eastwards all these years while neglecting Moscow’s concerns. Furthermore, each new member added to NATO’s frenzied anti-Russia charge.
We have been saying for a long time that such developments are inadmissible. Over the past decades we have offered a number of times to render the principle of comprehensive and indivisible security in the Euro-Atlantic a legally binding status since the West is obviously inclined to disregard its political obligations. However, we were invariably refused.
In this connection, as President Vladimir Putin stressed, we insist that serious long-term legal guarantees are provided, which would exclude NATO’s further advancement to the east and deployment of weapons on Russia’s western borders which are a threat to Russia. This must be done within a specific timeframe and on the basis of the principle of comprehensive and indivisible security.
To ensure the vital interests of European security, it is necessary to officially disavow the decision taken at the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest that Ukraine and Georgia «will become members of NATO» as contrary to the commitment undertaken by all the OSCE participating States not to strengthen their security «at the expense of the security of other States.»
We insist on the adoption of a legally binding agreement regarding the US and other NATO member countries’ non-deployment of strike weapons systems which threaten the territory of the Russian Federation on the territories of adjacent countries, both members and non-members of NATO.
We also insist on receiving a concrete response from NATO to our previous proposals on decreasing tension in Europe, including the following points:
– withdrawal of regions for operative military exercises to an agreed distance from Russia-NATO contact line;
– coordination of the closest approach point of combat ships and aircraft to prevent dangerous military activities, primarily in the Baltic and Black Sea regions;
– renewal of regular dialogue between the defence ministries in the Russia-US and Russia-NATO formats.
We call on Washington to join Russia’s unilateral moratorium on the deployment of surface short- and intermediate-range missiles in Europe, to agree on and introduce measures for the verification of reciprocal obligations.
Russia will shortly present draft international legal documents in the indicated areas to launch talks in respective formats.
In particular, we will submit a comprehensive proposal on legal security guarantees as part of preparations for the next round of the Russia-US dialogue on strategic stability. We will advocate holding an in-depth discussion of the military aspects of ensuring security via defence ministries with the engagement of the foreign ministries of Russia and NATO countries.
We believe that the OSCE, which includes all countries of the Euro-Atlantic region, should not to stay on the sidelines of discussions on addressing the issues of Europe’s security.
We urge our partners to carefully examine Russia’s proposals and start serious talks on agreements that will provide a fair and sustainable balance of interests in our common space.
A couple of days ago, Hal Turner posted the following story
REPORT: “Panic in Poland. Students Withdrawing from University and Going to DPR for Studies”
In which he stated:
New information coming out of eastern Europe says college students in Poland are panicking over a (now likely) coming war with Russia. Students are said to be withdrawing en-masse from Polish Universities and leaving the country to go study in the Donetsk People’s Republic in eastern Ukraine!
That would indicate the students believe it will be SAFER to be in Donetsk if/when war breaks out between Russia and Ukraine.
There is panic in Poland. Students en masse take documents from universities and go to study in the DPR”
What it ACTUALLY says is this:
The Donetsk PRC has overtaken Poland in the teaching of foreign languages.
This was reported to the Donbass Reports channel by Larisa Orlova, teacher of English and French.
So the story is FALSE and has not been taken down or corrected by Hal Turner
5 thoughts on “RUSSIA GIVES ULTIMATUM TO NATO”
I thought the second story didn’t pass the smell test. However, the first story is more worrying as it fits with other events and statements – including the analysis by Alexander Mercouris of the Duran. The only novel information is the date.
Long live Russia! Defeat these coward scum.
We surmise there is another head involved in this Russia/Ukraine affair. I do believe China will come into play, and quite possibly invade Taiwan at the moment Russia moves on the Ukraine.
Russia and China have been coordinating for quite a while militarily, including naval trials.
The two nations, we believe, feel it’s the perfect time to stretch the US, especially considering the present US administration, and the US military command has been significantly weakened, as well.
This has the potential to spark an unbelievable, devastating World War.
The MSM with their heads in the sands of drama, misinfo, disinfo, and outright politically inspired propaganda is NOT in the US best interest.
There’s really not much we can do, other than pray for God’s intervention.
After another absence, with difficulty getting back to Robin’s site, and reading your comments the first thing, without even reading article, this is just to say my thoughts for a while now would closely align with yours (we can pray, but I don’t feel God will ‘intervene’).
Except, as we now have an accelerating rise in many places with Omicron and potential for stronger effects, am wondering how that would play into events ?!
Anyways, am going to scan / download headlines here. May be back later.
MSM does not have their heads in the sand. And the ‘best interest’ of the US depends on your definition of the “US”. The MSM runs on ad revenue and kickbacks from their partners in crime – big pharma, big ag, and big war. So everything we hear from them promotes whatever their owners desire. Our only hope in this battle is to take back the media, (and secure the vote), but on the chessboard as it stands, we’re fighting a war using ammunition provided by the company we’re fighting the war against.