The following is an information- packed edition of TruNews yesterday.
They report on the latest reactions to the vaccines and of information that covid-19 is connected with neurological and even mental disorders and point to a study which says this is more common in people who have had covid-19 than in those who have had the vaccine.
They talk about this in relation to information that is coming out about the Wuhan bio lab, the Americans connected to it as well as evidence that points to amino acids connected with neurological and bleeding conditions being present in sars-covid-2.
I believe strongly in what they are doing and dealing with evidence as it presents itself and eschewing set ideological positions.
All of this, including the calls from Geert vanden Bossche is anathema to think the whole thing is a scam and viruses do not exist.
If they were so one would have to deny even the existance of biological weapons, would one not?
I agree with the TruNews people that the virus is real but the response is not.
I also agree that the probability is that sars covid-2 was a bioweapon released accidentally but possibly intentionally.
There are so many unknowns and contradictory information that I am suspecious of anyone who says they have all the answers.
Today on TRUNEWS, host Edward Szall and the team lay out the chilling side effects of COVID vaccines. We feature numerous reports of fainting around the world, and tie that to the reports of blood clots as a result of the vaccination
Here are some of the articles they discuss
One in 3 Covid survivors has suffered a neurological or psychiatric disorder within six months of infection with the virus, an observational study of more than 230,000 patient health records has estimated.
The study, published Tuesday in The Lancet Psychiatry journal, analyzed data from the electronic health records of 236,379 Covid patients from the U.S.-based TriNetX network, which includes more than 81 million people.
This group was compared with 105,579 patients diagnosed with influenza and 236,038 patients diagnosed with any respiratory tract infection, including influenza.
Overall, the estimated incidence of being diagnosed with a neurological or mental health disorder following a Covid infection was 34%, the study led by researchers at the University of Oxford found when looking at 14 neurological and mental health disorders.
For 13% of these people, it was their first recorded neurological or psychiatric diagnosis.
The most common diagnoses after having the coronavirus were anxiety disorders (occurring in 17% of patients), mood disorders (14%), substance misuse disorders (7%), and insomnia (5%). The incidence of neurological outcomes was lower, including 0.6% for brain hemorrhage, 2.1% for ischemic stroke, and 0.7% for dementia.
In the largest study of its kind, researchers from Boston Children’s Hospital found neurological involvement in 22 percent of children and adolescents hospitalized with acute COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). These symptoms included fatigue, headache, confusion, difficulty walking or crawling, or loss of taste and smell. However, 1 in 8 children with neurological involvement developed life-threatening conditions including stroke, encephalitis, and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
“The good news is that the vast majority of young individuals with neurologic involvement had symptoms that were not very serious and did not linger,” says Kerri LaRovere, MD, neurologist at Boston Children’s and co-first author of the study, published in JAMA Neurology.
The study was part of the national Overcoming COVID-19 Public Health Surveillance Registry, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and led by Adrienne Randolph, MD, MSc, a critical care physician at Boston Children’s. Another recent study described the key characteristics and differences in children and adolescents with COVID-19 and MIS-C from this cohort.
By comparison, only four per million people suffer a serious blood clot as a result of the AstraZeneca jab.
‘So, having COVID itself is a risk of clotting,’ said Professor Kelly, who noted that 16 per cent of people hospitalised with the disease suffered some form of clotting.
Professor Kelly was seeking to reassure Australians who are hesitant about the jab after a 48-year-old woman died five days after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration has convened a ‘special expert group’ to examine the woman’s death and work out if it was caused by the jab.
Professor Kelly urged Australians to take the vaccine to protect them from an inevitable outbreak.
‘We are in a very unusual situation here in Australia at the moment, with no community transmission and very few cases right throughout this year. That will not continue.
‘We will at some point in the future, we do not know when, but we will have cases here in Australia.
‘The chances of being infected will increase, so being vaccinated is a protection not only for yourself, but also for the people you care for,’ he said.
Daily Mail Australia has learnt the woman who died was a much-loved worker for a health food company which makes Weet-Bix.
Questions remain why the woman was given the British-made Covid jab, which has been linked to blood clots, a day after authorities recommended it not be administered to people under 50.
The woman received the vaccine on April 9, developed blood clots the following day, was placed on dialysis in an intensive care unit and died on April 14.
Sanitarium Health Food Company, which is based on the New South Wales Central Coast, confirmed the woman was one of its 800 employees.
‘We understand this case is under investigation by the coroner and the health department,’ a spokeswoman told Daily Mail Australia.
‘The company is saddened by the loss of a much loved employee, and we offer our heartfelt condolences to her family, friends and workmates.’
Sanitarium, which has its factory and head office at Berkeley Vale, makes Weet-Bix, Up & Go breakfast drinks and So Good soy, almond and coconut milks.
The company was founded in Melbourne in 1898, manufactures only plant-derived products and is wholly owned by the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
The morning after the new AstraZeneca advice was issued NSW Health announced a temporarily pause to its use until ‘informed consent’ forms were updated with information about the blood clot risk.
The alternative Pfizer vaccine was preferred for those under 50, such as the Central Coast woman and the AstraZeneca vaccine rollout for those over 50 resumed later that day.
Daily Mail Australia understands the woman who died was diabetic. Professor Kelly said she had ‘chronic conditions’.
A NSW Health spokesman said the department could not confirm any link between the woman receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine and her death.
Australia had been relying on the AstraZeneca dose for the bulk of its vaccination program – but links to rare cases of blood clots in some countries had thrown the government’s rollout into disarray.
Experts in Australia now say those under 50s should be offered an alternative, while the British-made jab has been stopped altogether in Denmark and the Netherlands.
Sky News in Australia is the only mainstream news outlet that is talking about the possibility of this being a Chinese bioweapon. This is taboo in the United States as well as in Jacinda Adern’s NZ.
‘Overwhelming circumstantial evidence’ points to COVID-19 lab leak
They then refer to a series of tweets put out by retired doctor Lawrence Stellin.
I found the following article:
Yes, COVID-19 Was a Biological Attack by the Chinese Communist Party
In a must-read article in the December 2020 issue of Indian Defense Review, Dr. Sharad S Chauhan defines “Opportunistic Bioterrorism” as:
“Concealment of the emergence of a biological agent, pathogen or a disease by acts of commission or omission with the knowledge that such an act will harm or kill humans’ animals or plants with the intent to intimidate or coerce a government or civilian population to further political or social objectives or by using a situation to get power or an advantage.”
That “opportunity” was COVID-19, a product of policies and actions undertaken by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
First and foremost, it is critical for everyone to understand that, in the People’s Republic of China, there is no difference between military and civilian research centers.
Chapter 78 of the CCP’s Thirteenth Five-Year Plan (2016-2020) describes the fusion of military and civilian research including the area of “synthetic biology.”
Even prior to the publication of that plan, it had been common practice for the CCP to change the name of military research centers to something more civilian-sounding and for Chinese scientists to disguise their military connections.
A second component of the CCP’s military-civilian fusion effort is the integration of Chinese scientists working abroad as part of the network, even to the extent that Chinese scientists have become U.S. citizens, but remain active members of the CCP’s program.
In that way, foreign institutions and foreign funding sources become de facto partners in the CCP’s research program and contributors to China’s military and economic might.
The most glaring, but far from the only example of such American “useful idiot” participants in the CCP military-civilian research program, is Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funded coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology via long-time CCP research collaborator Peter Daszak, who is head of the EcoHealth Alliance.
The CCP integration of military-civilian virus research is led by the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, where Dr. Wei Chen, a Major General in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the virologist, is Director of the Institute of Bioengineering and presumed to be the head of China’s biological warfare program.
In January 2020, the CCP dispatched Major General Wei Chen to Wuhan to take charge of the response to the growing pandemic. She was also responsible for China’s COVID-19 vaccine development.
It is also Major General Wei Chen’s own experience and research connections that provide background for the origin of COVID-19.
The following is just a snapshot of a more widespread and deeper internal and international network representing the fusion of China’s military-civilian research program.
In 2004 and 2005, Major General Wei Chen was working in the Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, where she studied the spike protein of the first SARS coronavirus using a genetic technology called RNA interference to silence gene expression of the virus, as well as analyzing immune therapy in SARS patients.
According to her publication record, between 2008 and 2013, Major General Wei Chen conducted experiments on dengue fever virus in the Department of Microbiology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing.
It is important to note that Chinese whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan claims that the backbone of the COVID-19 virus, bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21, was characterized and genetically engineered under the supervision of the Third Military Medical University in Chongqing.
Around 2014, Major General Wei Chen returned to the Academy of Military Medical Sciences as Director of the Institute of Bioengineering, where she supervised human testing in Africa of a genetically-engineered viral vector Ebola vaccine.
Dr. Yusen Zhou was one of the Chinese military scientists, who collaborated with Major General Wei Chen in the response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
He received his training as a military medical doctor and also studied the spike protein of the first SARS coronavirus in 2004, while working in the same research center as Major General Wei, the Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences.
Yusen Zhou’s co-author on that 2004 scientific article “Identification of Immunodominant Sites on the Spike Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus: Implication for Developing SARS Diagnostics and Vaccines” was Dr. Shibo Jiang.
Also a graduate of a military medical university, Shibo Jiang worked at the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute of the New York Blood Center for nearly twenty years and received more than $17 million in U.S. research grants, the vast majority coming from Fauci’s NIAID.
During that period, Shibo Jiang developed an extensive network of collaborative research with other U.S. virus research laboratories and became the nexus connecting China’s military-civilian research program with those in the United States.
At the same time, Shibo Jiang maintained research activities with Yusen Zhou and several PLA laboratories, described in detail here, while simultaneously inviting other Chinese scientists into his U.S. laboratory.
One was Dr. Lanying Du, allegedly Yusen Zhou’s wife, who is still an employee of the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute in New York and recently received a 5-year grant totally $4.1 million from Fauci’s NIAID.
Shibo Jiang’s U.S. network consisted of laboratories conducting cutting edge coronavirus research, including the controversial “gain of function” experiments:
Dr. Ralph Baric, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NC
Dr. Fang Li, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
Linfa Wang, director of the Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases at Duke University-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Chien-Te K. Tseng, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, home of the Department of Defense-funded Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases and the high viral BL-4 containment facility.
All of the above are linked to the CCP’s military-civilian research program via Yusen Zhou or the “bat woman”, Dr. Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Another CCP scientist linked to both the Chinese military and the highest levels of U.S. research programs is Dr. Gao Fu, also known as George F. Gao, a virologist and immunologist, who has served as Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC).
In 2019, he was elected a foreign associate of the U.S. National Academy of Science and the U.S. National Academy of Medicine.
Gao Fu’s colleague at the CCDC, Dr. Wenjie Tan, is not only linked to Shibo Jinag and Yusen Zhou, but is a close collaborator of Dr. Zhenhong Hu from the General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the PLA in Wuhan.
Zhenhong Hu conducted research with the Third Military Medical University from where the bat backbone of the COVID-19 virus is alleged to have originated.
The Third Military Medical University was also Major General Wei Chen’s place of employment for five years.
It is perhaps no coincidence that, according to patient data, the epicenter of the outbreak during its earliest phase was the General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the PLA (map coordinates 30.53148, 114.34356).
That location is less than one mile from the P-3 level laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center for Viral Diseases (map coordinates 30.53941, 114.35085).
That information also matches data published by the Wuhan Wuchang District Health Bureau stating that the highest concentration of infections in the early phase of the outbreak occurred in the residential areas about one mile from the hospital.
Those observations fit, in time and location, the social media data obtained from the Sina Weibo platform, which was designed as a channel for suspected COVID-19 patients to seek help.
It is interesting to note that during May 2020, the U.S. National Academy of Science initiated a series of conference calls between Chinese and U.S. scientists to exchange information about the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The three Chinese participants on those calls were Gao Fu, Wenjie Tan and the “bat woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The calls could also be described as de facto briefings for China’s military.
There is still much we do not know about the origin of COVID-19, largely due to a cover-up operation led by the CCP and facilitated by members of the Western scientific community, some U.S. government officials and a compliant media.
One could argue that they are all co-conspirators in “Opportunistic Bioterrorism.”
About the Author
Col. Lawrence Sellin (Ret.)
The Wuhan Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the Validity of the Yan Reports Are Further Proved by the Failure of Two Uninvited “Peer Reviews”
Li-Meng Yan (MD, PhD)1, Shu Kang (PhD)1, Jie Guan (PhD)1, Shanchang Hu (PhD)1 1Rule of Law Society & Rule of Law Foundation, New York, NY, USA. Correspondence: email@example.com
A year has passed since the COVID-19 pandemic first started. Its damage so far is astonishing: 127 million people have been infected and, among them, 2.78 million died. These numbers continue to grow at a significant speed, indicating that the pandemic is far from being over. Furthermore, mutant viral strains continue to emerge, and no public policies or treatment strategies seem to be sufficiently effective in blocking COVID-19. There seems to be a consensus that the virus will not be eradicated and humans will continue to live under the influence of COVID-19 in the foreseeable future.
The defeat of humans by COVID-19 is for two fundamental reasons. First, SARS-CoV- 2, the causative agent of COVID- 19, is not a naturally occurring pathogen but an Unrestricted Bioweapon. It has designed and significantly enhanced functions and therefore could not be controlled easily using strategies that would normally work for naturally occurring pathogens. It is a product of the bioweapons program of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, the network of which includes not only the CCP scientists but also certain overseas scientists and organizations. SARS-CoV-2 was created based on template viruses ZC45 and ZXC21, which were originally discovered in bats by scientists of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The subsequent laboratory modifications had enabled its ability to infect humans as well as had enhanced the virus in its pathogenicity, transmissibility, and lethality.
The second fundamental reason of our defeat was that the world was made to look away from the true nature of SARS-CoV-2 and therefore responded inadequately on multiple aspects and occasions. A massive misinformation campaign has been undertaken by the CCP government to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2, which involved destroying data and samples, publishing fabricated viruses on top scientific journals, controlling the narrative of the origin debate through bribed top scientists and organizations, amplifying the falsified natural origin theory through media control, labeling all other origin theories as “conspiracy theories”, and defaming individuals who reveal the truth of SARS-CoV-2. As a result of the CCP’s efforts here, the true, weaponized nature of SARS-CoV-2 has been obscured and was not known by most of the public.
Full report available here: https://zenodo.org/record/4650821#.YGR3vbpB3Du
Sky News is not the only Australian news outlet to be asking questions about the Wuhan laboratory. I have not watched it so do not know the tenor of the reporting. But the questions are beginning to be asked whereas a year ago it was taboo.
Was COVID-19 made inside a Chinese lab? | Under Investigation
I also keep coming back to the speech senior general, Chi Hao-tian gave to his CCP comrades before his retirement in 2008. He makes specific mention of using biological weapons against the United States. It is indication of aggressive designs against America behind closed doors at a time when relations were still very good between the two countries.