Click the link below to watch the video. PS, if anyone knows how to embed tweets into Substack, please let me know in comments.

Link to tweet

Historical Background:

The first issue that I addressed in public statements (even without having any social media presence or followers back then) was vax lot variability analysis in 2021. I was not the source of the idea – that came from a person who wishes to stay anonymous. He alerted me to the fact that VAERS had the lot numbers and that the data looked extremely variable. He made the first online lookup tool to check the lot numbers vs the number of adverse events and deaths reported for those lots. I downloaded VAERS data in September and October 2021 and did about 20 hrs of analysis in clunky Excel. I could not believe what I was seeing: the variability batch-to-batch was enormous – few reports in most batches and thousands in a smaller sub-group. I wrote the analysis up the best I could, in Powerpoint slides, and I contacted several alt media journalists. I also contacted Mike Yeadon and his media collaborator Robin Monotti on Telegram. Both responded. My analysis was published in a small news media outlet in the UK, and got picked up by a few alternative news channels. Craig Paardekooper, a British pharmacy student who was forced to leave his studies due to vaccination mandates, saw it and did his own analyses and found the now famous data clustering – deaths by alphabet. The batches were not just hugely variable, the variability was not random. No typical demographic and other data adjustments ever explained this variability. Age of the vax recipients, frequently cited by the detractors of the lot variability evidence, at best, explains about 30% of variability. And one should point out that median age of severe adverse events and deaths, even in early roll out was about 15 years below life expectancy – these were not “just old people”.

The conclusion I and my colleagues arrived early on meant it was likely not just sloppy manufacturing, but pointed at the intent to harm. Of course since then this conclusion has been validated by numerous pieces of evidence: regulatory documentation, direct vial testing, interviews with insiders, and most importantly legal basis under which EUA Countermeasures are exempt from cGMP rules.

Craig made many analytical discoveries in VAERS lot data and started the “How Bad is Your Batch” website dedicated to this issue.  We collaborated for some time on the website content, and our group included a variety of data analysts from several countries, including at some point Max Schmeling and his colleagues from Denmark. The website became an invaluable resource for all questions related to injection batches and by the end of 2022 received over 100 million visitors from all over the world.

The information about heterogeneity/adulteration of batches was and remains one of the most effective “red-pilling” materials. There are many people who supported our work and provided useful input and helped share this information despite heavy censorship. There are however people on the “freedom side” who are still denying that this data is valid, and therefore there is no significant variation across the contents of the vials – this is despite clear evidence, numerous independent validation points of our original conclusions, and numerous other parts of corroborating evidence. I would like to point this video that my colleagues and I posted on Bitchute in February 2022 discussing this and showing that batch variability is a real factor and not explained by “normal” data adjustments like the age of the vaccinated.

Recently several news and podcasts have published this story – discussing that approximately 30% of the vials distributed (at least in EU) were “placebo”. Here is a good article on this on Brownstone.

What is this claim based on? Two pieces of indirect evidence:

1. The analysis of vaccine adverse event data from Denmark by Max Schmeling, which I covered previously.

   

Note that the graph above is dose adjusted and these are the doses administered in Denmark only. These batches appear in other EU countries, but I found evidence that toxicity of the same batches looks different between countries (or states in the US), therefore I advise not to combine data from other countries in this analysis.

2. The evidence from Germany that the regulators only tested “bad” batches and did not test the “benign” batches – as if they knew a-priori which are which. That is indeed rather damning evidence of a pre-planned mass poisoning.

Please watch this video where this information from Germany is discussed. The video is in German with English subtitles. The authors discussed that the color scheme corresponds to the analysis from Denmark, and turns out that mysteriously, Paul Ehrlrich Institute in Germany (German CDC) did not test on release the yellow (low toxicity) batches, but did test the blue and green ones. There is no explanation why.

Does this prove the “yellow” batches are placebo?

Not really. Caution is required when interpreting these data. The German authors did not say these are placebo, but rather that they look “something like placebo”. They also noted that in vaccine studies “placebo” can contain all adjuvants and other “inactive” ingredients. We know from declared ingredients on vax labels those are completely novel lipids not properly disclosed (proprietary), and actually harmful substances (such as PEG). My own guess is that the yellow vials might have contained “empty” hydrogel formulations (or LNPs, which might be the same thing), and the green and blue – some combinations of nucleic acid based materials added, including plasmid DNA “contaminants” and endotoxins. Many vials tested by the independent groups found a variety of contaminants – most frequently toxic metals and objects from nano- to macro-scale. Some groups state they found graphene oxide, and I am not a specialist in this analysis to confirm their findings. In any case, this requires more verification.

The journalists and podcasters that spread the message changed that to a more definitive statement of “placebo” which is unfortunately not accurate.

These batches show up in adverse event reports, so they were associated with at least some adverse events. Therefore they are not saline. Furthermore, no pure saline vials have been found in the independent vial testing that I am aware of. So, caution is warranted. The “yellow” batches appear to be less toxic overall, but we still do not have a full picture on the vial contents, and a full transparent investigation is needed.

Overall, this proves the conclusion about fraudulent, non-compliant manufacturing, various formulations in different batches, and adulteration of batches with more toxic ingredients – pointing to the intentional act of mass poisoning with these shots

“Vaccination” batches: study proves frightening facts – Punkt.PRERADOVIC with Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker and Prof. Dr. Jörg Matysik (English subtitles)