WHO Finally Admits COVID PCR Tests Unreliable But Promoted Them Anyway To Justify Vaccines
21 December, 2020
The World Health Organization finally released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives — which they have cynically used to justify a worldwide vaccination program:
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results. To quote their own words [our emphasis]: “Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”
They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]: “The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell…
Dr. Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying, “…With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, [Mullis] once said, “If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”
…This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government’s own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose.
Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus.
…So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?
The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.
Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.
Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.
After months of flooding the data pool with false positives, miscounting deaths “by accident”, adding “Covid19 related death” to every other death certificate…they can stop. The create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again.
…as long as we all do as we’re told. Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example – and the CT value can start to climb again, and they bring back their magical disease.
We reported on this PCR fakery back in July — and we also predicted that they would arbitrarily lower the PCR cycling threshold to convince the public that the vaccine has been a success after it’s been implemented in a large swath of the population.
They promoted the PCR test from the beginning of this “pandemic” for this very reason — that it could provide whatever results they wanted, depending on the situation.
Yet despite admitting to this massive scientific fraud, the public will continue to believe that the pandemic continues to rage unabated — while we are conditioned like rats in a cage to get vaccinated so as to avoid punishment — economic and social electro-shock treatments.
And let’s not forget a major source of the World Health Organization’s funding leading up to and during this “pandemic” — Bill Gates, a transhumanist proponent who envisions a not-too-distant future where people’s internal biochemistry can be controlled and manipulated using nanotechnology implanted via vaccines.
Early on, Bill Gates cynically predicted a “second wave” of the “pandemic” that would “get everybody’s attention” — because he and his pal, Anthony Fauci, knew how they planned to misuse the PCR test to manufacture the appearance of a “second wave”.
Of course, it’s much easier to predict the future when you have the wealth and power to manipulate world events to make your predictions come true — and pay off the media to promote you as a prophet — while at the same time denying that you had any hand in it whatsoever.