I have put together a video for those with little time that puts together the information you need to know about the vaccine and that does not include the possibility that this alters the human DNA so it can be connected to artificial intelligence (“Human DNA”)
This is just the science as we know it.
I have taken brief excerpts from:
- Harry Vox who predicted all this back in 2014 with Richie Allen
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with Del Bigtee
- Dr. Judy Mikovits
Here is more information:
CDC DATA: 200,000 “COVID DEATHS” MAY ACTUALLY BE FLU, HEART ATTACKS, POISON, OR GUNSHOT
19 November, 2020
Part One of Three-Part Series
Coronavirus statistics may be being inflated in a way that boggles the mind. In April Dr. Deboroah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force made clear that primary-cause COVID deaths, and deaths in which COVID was merely present, would be taken as one and the same. Birx said: “to mark it as COVID-19 infection the intent is right now that those if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19.” The key words were “with COVID” and “COVID death.” The very fact that Birx was erasing the distinction showed that she was aware that there was one. The government was true to its word. In making “with COVID” the same as “of COVID,” COVID totals could differ sharply from reality. At present, the COVID totals being announced by mass media, taken from the CDC, are defined as any death “involving” COVID, whether it was the primary cause of death or not. This includes 124,000 deaths “involving” COVID who also had flu, 53,000 who had heart attacks of the kind which are mostly caused by long-term narrowing and hardening of the arteries, around 10,000 cancers, and 26,000 kidney (renal) failures. Below: CDC page showing deaths need only “involve” COVID to be listed as a COVID death. Source: “Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),” Table 2
Below: CDC page showing deaths in which influenza (flu) is on the death certificate. Source: “CDC: Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics”, Table 3
In every case, COVID only needed to be “presumed” present, i.e. not confirmed by a positive lab test, to be counted in the total. All present COVID tests, most of which use “PCR” technology, are criticized for delivering large numbers of false positives, as high as 50% to 90%. These are the “cases” which lockdowns are now based upon. A careful reading of the CDC table shows that the heading is labeled “All deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) U07.1” in “Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),” Table 2. “UO7.1” is both the diagnosis and the death code used for COVID-19. Table 3 of the page “Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics”, shows “conditions contributing” to death, even though these conditions could include, as we shall see, a gunshot wound to the head. Subtracting the “conditions” which are often the primary cause of death; flu, cardiac arrest, heart failure, and kidney failure (renal failure) from 330,000, commonly used as the figure for coronavirus deaths by the end of December, the possible COVID primary-cause-of-death figure goes down to about 130,000. The CDC notes that only 6% of the total deaths died of COVID alone, with no other co-morbid conditions. It then reveals that each patient listed had an average of 2.6 other co-morbid conditions.
COVID Deaths or Flu Deaths? Flu More Deadly Than COVID After 84
According to CDC statistics, to elderly over 84, flu is more deadly than COVID. Therefore if a patient over 84 had both COVID and flu, he or she was actually more likely to die of the flu. Below source: Bloomberg News
COVID is a 99.4% – 99.8% survival rate disease, similar to common flu. This is a much higher survival rate than either SARS or MERS, which are two other coronaviruses, as well as Spanish Flu, Asian Flu (H2N2), or Hong Kong Flu (see below.) The Infection Mortality Rates (IFR) shown below are the number of people expected to die of a disease, per infection. The lower it is, the higher the survival rate. The survival rate is 100 minus the IFR.
It is true that severe cases of COVID can have serious after-effects, but this is true of any serious case of a respiratory disease, including flu.
As for ease of transmission, which some point out is a key difference between COVID and other viruses warranting extraordinary measures, it must never be forgotten that it was a handful of governors from densely populated states, starting with Andrew Cuomo, who got the sharp death spikes underway which then spread across the country, by transferring COVID patients into nursing homes.
Those transfers, whether the patients were carrying COVID or normal flu, were like deliberately setting fire to barns full of hay. Other governors were Tom Wolf of PA, Gretchen Whitmer in MI (Detroit), and NJ Governor Phil Murphy, all states were COVID deaths per capita are still in the top ten.
The timing and choice of states could not have been better to light a match and start a national panic.About 3 million people die in the US every year, around 650,000 by heart attacks, and a similar number from cancers. To put some of the thousands of alleged COVID deaths announced each day into some sort of perspective, normally an average of about 8,000 people die each day in the US. Medicare pays a 20% add-on for patients whose diagnosis includes COVID. Starting last Sept. 1, a lab test was required, whereas before, a clinical “presumed” COVID diagnosis sufficed. At the same time, flu deaths seem to have all but disappeared. In 2017 – 2018, the flu season accounted for 80,000 US deaths. CDC reports under 7,000 this year.
Of great interest is the category for “Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning, and other adverse events” (10,000 of them.) This tantalizing category does not disappoint (see below.)Source: CDC: Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
On December 15th, it was reported that a Colorado county coroner complained to state health authorities that two of her death certificates had been added to the state’s COVID totals. The decedents had actually died of gunshot wounds.
Sky Hi News reported:
“The Grand County coroner is disputing the number of COVID-19 deaths the state is reporting for the county. Brenda Bock told county commissioners on Tuesday that the state is reporting two additional COVID-19 deaths in Grand, which she believes should not be included. Bock explained that a couple who died of gunshot wounds late last month have been included in the state’s numbers.”
However, the couple had tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days before their deaths.
“Grand County Public Health Director Brene Belew-Ladue explained that state and Centers for Disease Control reporting protocol requires that anyone who tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days of their death be included in these numbers.” (emphasis added.)
In July, a young man in Florida was killed in a motorcycle accident, but was marked down as COVID because he had a positive test recently. The county health officer Dr. Raul Pino said that one “could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash.”The Colorado County coroner said:
“That might be the process, but it’s not right,”
COVID is Not 1918 Spanish Flu, But 1957 Asian Flu
It takes only a few minutes of web searching to see that present COVID numbers, even if accepted as true, do not remotely approach frequent media comparisons to the Spanish Flu of 1918, but to two other entirely overlooked pandemics in the US, the 1957 Asian Flu and the 1968 Hong Kong Flu, the latter of which, in that same summer, the country enjoyed the largest “spreader” event in US history, Woodstock.
The event might be called the greatest experiment in herd immunity ever, as 1/2 million young people jammed cheek-to-jowl sharing joints, whiskey bottles, kisses and hugs with no disastrous effects on society afterwards.
Because the US population was so much smaller, about half of today’s, only a per capita comparison of deaths with previous pandemics is illuminating. In the below chart, the orange bar represents the number of “COVID Deaths” which may have had another primary cause, such as flu, certain heart events, and kidney failure. Possibly terminal cancers would add another 10,000, but are not included.
COVID-19 is Novel But Not New
The media message hammers home the words “the novel coronavirus” without ever explaining that although this virus is novel, coronaviruses are anything but new. A former Chief Science Officer and Vice President for Pfizer and his colleagues write:
“There are at least four well characterised family members (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) which are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus.”
The scientists say that much of the population already has some level of “T-cell” immunity from exposure to other coronaviruses.
They go on to say that, because of this prior resistance, only 15-25% of a population being infected may be sufficient to reach herd immunity. (See: “Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says “Second Wave” Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, “Pandemic is Over”)
What About Excess Deaths? Death by Lockdown
To determine if COVID deaths are just a shell game, of pushing into the COVID column other causes of death, the other question to ask is, what would be a normal number of deaths for the year? Are there many more or less than would be expected?
About 40,000 deaths are added per year as the natural result of the aging Baby Boomer demographic bulge.
A study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, the “Woolf study,” found a startling number. The doctors and scientists estimated that 20% of excess deaths over and above previous years were due not to COVID, but to the effects of the lockdowns.
As covered in Medical News Today:
“Some people who never had the virus may have died because of disruptions caused by the pandemic,” says Dr. Steven H. Woolf, the director emeritus of the Virginia university’s Center on Society and Health and first author of the study. “These include people with acute emergencies, chronic diseases like diabetes that were not properly cared for, or emotional crises that led to overdoses or suicides.”
Another widely-cited study by the Well Being Trust has estimated that 150,000 more people will have died of “deaths of despair,” suicides, drug overdoses, over the next ten years due to the “mitigation measures” enacted over the virus.
If the 20% of excess deaths figure is extrapolated, then non-COVID deaths due to despair, deferred or canceled treatment of serious conditions, and conditions made worse by worsening health due to social and physical isolation, could account for 40,000 of the 200,000 unexpected deaths, or up to 40,000 people who died who would not have otherwise.
This month the New York Times reported “40,000 extra deaths from diabetes, Alzheimer’s, high blood pressure and pneumonia” alone.
The Washington Post reported in December:
“…in a separate excess deaths analysis, the CDC estimated that since Feb. 1, between about 20,000 and 49,000 more people have died of all non-covid-19 causes than would be expected in a typical year.”
Subtracting these from 2020 excess deaths, this would make perhaps 160,000 deaths due to COVID, which is far less, in per capita terms, than the number who died in the US in the 1957 Asian Flu pandemic, which no one outside nursing home workers even knew was going on. Although up to 4 million died worldwide, 20,000 in UK, the Brussels World Fair was held in 1958 from April through October, and Chuck Berry played to a packed Apollo Theater in New York on March 7.
As now, the Asian Flu was largely an end-of-normal-lifespan disease. As now, there were age-wise statistical outliers, but the media never sought them out and magnified them to fan the flames of panic.
US Yearly Deaths
2018 2.84 M
A disturbing pattern found in the excess deaths not-due-to-COVID was that, while the median age of the COVID death worldwide is 80, the “deaths of despair” and deferred medical procedures overwhelmingly hit people in their prime. While COVID kills overwhelmingly elderly, lockdowns are killing our young people.
Even in the higher ages ranges, over 80, where COVID is hardly a death sentence depending on health, with a 90% chance of survival, isolation and loneliness among the elderly is thought to be taking a toll.
The American Association of Retired Persons reports on a daughter’s experience with her 99-year-old mother:
“Helen was confined to the second floor of her complex — where her room was located — for months. Her outdoor walks ceased, and so did her mobility. She became bedbound. Her mind, already battling dementia, deteriorated, too….
“She would have made it to well over 100 but that’s not going to happen now. … She’s collateral damage of this COVID-19 seclusion, passing away because of a broken heart.””
Even if the official COVID death count were 100% accurate, and somehow COVID critters had developed the power to shoot guns, the per capita impact on today’s US population would be no more than one-third higher than the toll was when Chuck Berry took the stage at the Apollo in 1958. Per capita US deaths for the Spanish Flu were six times what we see for COVID.
It is easy to see that there is a drive on that does not seem proportional to a 99.8% survival rate virus, the death count of which is highly questionable, which is in the league of two previous pandemics in which absolutely nothing was closed, concerts and bars remained packed, and the world did not end. Nor even slow down.
When three US presidents rolled up their sleeves to show “See, the vaccine is okay!” – Hamlet might have come to mind: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
Former Vice President and Chief Scientist of Pfizer Dr. Micheal Yeadon writes:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”
Why has the mainstream media and the mainstream medical establishment sold their souls to participate in the ghoulish, 24/7 psychological assault which is depriving children of their childhoods, and fostering a culture of mistrust and fear of every other human being?
Why the campaign to squash or misrepresent the potential of remedies such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), when even now doctors and scientists stick to their guns and say that the toll of true COVID deaths could have been lower, one fifth of the fatalities we are seeing now, according to Yale’s Dr. Harvey Risch, which would bring the pandemic, as it is, to a virtual end?
Below: Countries which use HCQ versus countries which do not. Source
Why spend great amounts of money, as Bill Gates does through the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, to design and conduct flawed studies which ask the wrong questions and therefore get the wrong answers on HCQ?
The same Bill Gates who funded the research of the discredited professor, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, whose paper was the blueprint for the lockdowns?
Why do Youtube and Facebook aggressively censor speech which would allow citizens to themselves weigh all evidence and arguments on the broad issue of COVID? And decide for themselves, as intended in a free speech society, what is true and what is not?
Distinguished scientists have said that coronaviruses do not behave in multiple waves, and that what we are seeing in “second wave” COVID deaths may be the flu season rolled into other mis-categorized deaths to create a second wave of COVID.
As for vaccines, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nephew of the slain president, Bobby’s son, and safe-vaccination activist and founder of Children’s Health Defense, writes:“Scientists first attempted to develop coronavirus vaccines after China’s 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak. Teams of US & foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs. Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1960s. Two children died.”
For answers to these questions, read Parts II and III of this series.
Part II: Science Backs Dr. Judy Mikovits’ Warning That COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million Americans
SCIENCE BACKS DR. JUDY MIKOVITS’ WARNING THAT COVID VACCINE COULD KILL 50 MILLION AMERICANS
In a viral video, virologist Dr. Judy Mikovits says that a coronavirus vaccine could kill 50 million Americans in coming years, which will then be blamed on new strains of COVID, which will be used as a rationale for more, mandatory vaccines. The deaths will be due to viral interference which even Dr. Anthony Fauci has warned of as problematic in vaccines.Fauci told a congressional committee in the spring:“I must warn that there is a possibility of negative consequences where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection,”
HERE IS BILL GATES’ INJECTABLE BIOCHIP, FOR THOSE WHO THINK IT IS CONSPIRACY THEORY
A Silicon Valley company with early funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as the US Department of Defense’s highly secretive Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, is expecting approval of an injectable, permanent under-the-skin biochip sensor made of advanced hydrogel material sometime in the spring.
The chip is being touted as a way to detect COVID infections as soon as the body begins to show symptoms.
It has been known since the end of May, according to the CDC, that COVID is a 99.8% survival rate virus, similar to flu, which is 99.9%. While it is true that severe cases of COVID can have serious after-effects, this is true of any serious case of a respiratory disease, including flu.
Defense One, a defense industry trade website, writes in “A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection.”
“Why are pandemics so hard to stop? Often it’s because the disease moves faster than people can be tested for it. The Defense Department is helping to fund a new study to determine whether an under-the-skin biosensor can help trackers keep up — by detecting flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show. Its maker, Profusa, says the sensor is on track to try for FDA approval by early next year.”
According to a Profusa press release the biosensor is:
Inserted under the skin with a syringe, the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection. The other part is an electronic component attached to the skin. It sends light through the skin, detects the fluorescent signal and generates another signal that the wearer can send to a doctor, website, etc. It’s like a blood lab on the skin…”
Once implanted the chip is permanent, fusing with living tissue and blood vessels:
“Smaller than a grain of rice, each biosensor is a flexible fiber about 5 mm long and half a millimeter wide, comprised of a porous scaffold that induces capillary and cellular ingrowth from surrounding tissue…The data is relayed to a smart phone for an encrypted personal record and historical tracking. Data can be shared securely via digital networks with healthcare providers.”
Profusa says the sensor:
“is on track to try for FDA approval by early next year.”
Critics of the technology, such as Dr. Carrie Madej, assert that the chip represents a total control platform which links humans to an artificial intelligence network, which can track and read every facet of a person’s life, including mood, fear, anxiety, even level of sexual activity, by detecting and reading the body’s complex chemistry at all times.
Research funding for Profusa biochip by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, from 2012 to 2016, can be seen at a University of California at San Francisco Global Research Projects website, BELOW.
Gates Foundation Funded Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson, Who Made Lockdowns Possible
The pubic record now shows that Bill Gates gave nearly $8 million to Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson, author of the now discredited report which forecast over 2 million dead in 2020 in the US if it did not lock down and implement mask laws. The report became the basis, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci and other international health officials, for the present lockdowns. The report is entitled “Report 9 – Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand”
Because the country of Sweden decided it would not lock down, and never closed bars, restaurants, most schools, sports, or other businesses, Ferguson’s report forecast Sweden’s COVID death count would be 100,000 by June. It is presently under 6,000, with the rate steadily declining. Sweden now has a far lower death rate than the US, Italy, Spain, UK, and Belgium, countries which engaged in devastating lockdowns.
The website MedicalXpress.com reported in “Sweden bucks trend in refusing to recommend masks”:
While most of the world has come to terms with covering their noses and mouths in crowded places, people in Sweden are going without, riding buses and metros, shopping for food, and going to school maskless, with only a few rare souls covering up…Sweden never closed its schools, businesses or cafes and restaurants, allowing the virus to circulate, and has therefore had a consistently high level of community transmission.
Below: COVID Deaths per Million in Population, as of October 13, Sweden lower than US
Gates largess to Imperial College also included a separate, unrelated grant of $79 million in March.
The National Review reports on Ferguson:
Johan Giesecke, the former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory. He also says it was, sadly, “one of the most wrong.”
Dr. Jay Schnitzer of the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center in San Diego put it even more bluntly:
“I’m normally reluctant to say this about a scientist, but he dances on the edge of being a publicity-seeking charlatan.”
One of Ferguson’s fiercest critics, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, told an interviewer:
“It’s important that you know most scientists don’t accept that it [Ferguson’s model] was even faintly right…but the government is still wedded to the model.”
Former Ronald Reagan Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and a senior editor at the Wall Street Journal, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, has called Bill and Melinda Gates “the worse threat faced by human health and human freedom.”
A Mandatory Biochip Can Work Hand-in-Hand with Other Gates-Backed Technologies.
Despite efforts to paint critics of Gates as “conspiracy theorists,” the public record and his own statements cannot be escaped. Gates has worked hard to swat away talk of simpler remedies for COVID such as hydroxychloroquine, backed by scientist-doctors such as Yale’s Dr. Harvey Risch, and insisted that a ramped-up, worldwide system of vaccinations are the future.
Although Gates is a college drop-out and does not hold any medical or science degree of any kind, he has called his opponent on lockdowns, White House Coronavirus Advisor Dr. Scott Atlas, a “pseudo-expert.” Atlas is an MD and a Stanford professor.
“eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global re-opening up.”
The Gates-backed ID2020 Alliance markets the idea as necessary for disadvantaged Third World families to obtain proper “services.” It is but a half-step to combine all medical, financial, and personal records with a permanent chip implant.
Artificial Intelligence Platform Connected to Each Human
Gates’s Microsoft has taken an early lead in patents and research which would actually be able to “mine” bits of digital currency from people linked to an artificial intelligence platform connected by 5G.
Such a “conspiracy” source as PC Magazine writes:
the human user would need to have a sensor attached to, or installed in, their body. Microsoft envisages users being rewarded for allowing their bodies to be monitored in this way by paying them in cryptocurrency for performing specific tasks.
Says PC Magazine:
As well as brain waves and heat, the patent also suggests using “body fluid flow” and “organ activity and movement” to track a range of tasks…
If one can be “rewarded” for good behaviors, can one be punished for those behaviors the machine deems “bad?” The nephew of the slain president, environmental lawyer and activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says the human race has good reason to be alarmed.
Perhaps being at a beach during a lockdown period will be noticed by your tracker, since physical location 24/7 will be among the easiest things to see. Once fined by authorities for breaking lockdown or curfew, the sum could simply be automatically subtracted from your “digital wallet.”
Ancillary to biochips monitored and controlled by AI is the rapid development of in-body nanoparticles, which are already being seriously aimed at producing “super-soldiers.” Although in the history of experimenting on soldiers, the well-being of the actual soldier has never been a consideration.
Although science websites tout the possible beneficial uses of nanoparticle technology in the body, such as fighting cancer (rather than clean up the environment of cancer-causing toxins,) science thinkers such as Adam Keiper, Senior Editor of The New Atlantis, write that:
Nanotechnology could theoretically be used to make mind-control systems, invisible and mobile eavesdropping devices, or unimaginably horrific tools of torture.
As RFK Jr. says: “It would be the end of dissent.”
Global Real-Time Video Satellite Surveillance –
A group of wealthy investors led by Bill Gates have plans to blanket the globe with real-time satellite surveillance, openly admitted in publications like Newsweek. There could literally be nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. With the use of facial recognition technology already deployed in China, all privacy and freedom of movement will be gone.
“Will Big Brother be something out of this world? A company called EarthNow, whose investors include Bill Gates, tech mogul Greg Wyler and companies like Airbus and SoftBank Group, announced this week that it has plans to launch a “large constellation of advanced imaging satellites” to provide real-time images of “almost anywhere on Earth.””
Is It Really All About Gates?
It would be absurd to say that Gates is a single madman who wants to rule the world. Others within his elite with similar power could stop him if they wanted to.
It would be more reasonable to say he is a front man of sorts. Acting with the approval of key members of his class.
The world’s big banks cater heavily to the small number of the world’s richest people. According to a report from investment bank Credit Suisse, in 2017 the top 1 percent of global citizens own 50.1 percent of all household wealth, up from 45.5 percent in 2000.
Gates is an imperfect frontman, as he certainly has blood on his hands. In India, a committee of investigation found that thousands of girls, whose families were illiterate, were maimed by his vaccine trials.
The credible India Economic Times reports:
“The committee found that…In many other cases, thumbprint impressions of their poor and illiterate parents were duly affixed onto the consent form. The children also had no idea about the nature of the disease or the vaccine.”
Neither the girls nor their families could read nor write, and their thumbprints were used as signatures for consent for vaccine trials they did not understand. This was in violation of principles established at the Nuremberg Trials, following the trial of the Nazi doctor Josef Mengele, that no experiments could be conducted on a person without their fully informed consent. Seven of the 23 defendants for illegal experiments were sentenced to death.
Gates could be prosecuted on these ground alone, by any duly sworn prosecutor in any nation that is signatory to the Geneva Conventions.
There is already one lawsuit underway, in Belgium, which names Gates and Ferguson as defendants in a scheme to defraud the public by the criminal exploitation of the COVID crisis.
For his part, another name who has played a prominent role in pushing the narrative of masks, lockdowns, and social distancing, Dr. Anthony Fauci, was the subject of what should have been an earth-shaking report in the mainstream Newsweek. The report details, minutely, Dr. Fauci’s role in controversially granting funding of over $7 million to Wuhan Lab in China, for bat coronavirus research which was considered so dangerous it was banned in the US. (Newsweek: “Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research”)
Gates’ reach is impressive, but difficult to hide in an as-yet free society. Recently Fauci and others have been reciting that if only everyone in the nation wore masks consistently, 130,000 lives could be saved, saying nothing about the extensive science suggesting hydroxychloroquine protocols are effective. It turns out the study which makes this conclusion on masks comes out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
Below: No mask, no lockdown Sweden